Ryzen 5 7640HS vs Xeon W-1370

Ryzen 5 7640HS vs Xeon W-1370 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 7640HS

6 / 12

22,921

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon W-1370

8 / 16

22,948

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 7640HS vs Xeon W-1370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 7640HS vs Xeon W-1370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 7640HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,921 vs 22,948).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1370, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Xeon W-1370

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7640HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $323 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7640HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 7640HS better than Xeon W-1370?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-1370 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 7640HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-1370 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 7640HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-1370 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 5 7640HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $323 MSRP, and it still gives you a 25.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon W-1370 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. Xeon W-1370 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (71.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 7640HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 5 7640HS vs Xeon W-1370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 7640HS

The Ryzen 5 7640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,921 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-1370

The Xeon W-1370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 22,948 points. Launch price was $362.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 7640HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-1370 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon W-1370 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7640HS versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1370 — a 2% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1370 (base: 4.3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7640HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-1370 uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7640HS scores 22,921 against the Xeon W-1370's 22,948 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon W-1370. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7640HS	Xeon W-1370
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	5 GHz	5.1 GHz+2%
Base Clock	4.3 GHz+48%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)	Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark	22,921	22,948

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 7640HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1370 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.