
Ryzen 5 8645HS

Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Ryzen 5 8645HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 8645HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 8645HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 8645HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 140W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Ryzen Threadripper 1920 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
2017Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 8645HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,066 vs 22,257).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $799 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8645HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌211.1% higher power demand at 140W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 8645HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 8645HS better than Ryzen Threadripper 1920?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 8645HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 8645HS
The Ryzen 5 8645HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,257 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen Threadripper 1920
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,066 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 8645HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8645HS versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — a 27.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8645HS (base: 4.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 8645HS uses the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 8645HS scores 22,257 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1920's 22,066 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 8645HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8645HS vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8645HS | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+32% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+34% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 32 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 22,257 | 22,066 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 13,316 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,574 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,675 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 8645HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8645HS | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | SP3r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-7500 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 5 8645HS) / not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1920). The Ryzen 5 8645HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 8645HS targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 8645HS rivals Core i5-13500H.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8645HS | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 760M | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V (SVM) | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












