
Ryzen 5 8645HS

Xeon E5-4640 v4
Ryzen 5 8645HS vs Xeon E5-4640 v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 8645HS vs Xeon E5-4640 v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 8645HS vs Xeon E5-4640 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 8645HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 105W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Xeon E5-4640 v4 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,257 vs 22,559).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4640 v4, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-4640 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 8645HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,837 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8645HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 8645HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 8645HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 8645HS better than Xeon E5-4640 v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 8645HS vs Xeon E5-4640 v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 8645HS
The Ryzen 5 8645HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,257 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-4640 v4
The Xeon E5-4640 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 22,559 points. Launch price was $2,837.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 8645HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-4640 v4 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-4640 v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8645HS versus 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-4640 v4 — a 63.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8645HS (base: 4.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 5 8645HS uses the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-4640 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 8645HS scores 22,257 against the Xeon E5-4640 v4's 22,559 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon E5-4640 v4. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8645HS vs 30 MB on the Xeon E5-4640 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8645HS | Xeon E5-4640 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+92% | 2.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+105% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 30 MB+88% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 3 MB+200% |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 22,257 | 22,559+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 13,316 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,574 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,675 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 8645HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4640 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-7500 on the Ryzen 5 8645HS versus DDR4 2133 MHz on the Xeon E5-4640 v4 — the Ryzen 5 8645HS supports 251.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-4640 v4 supports up to 1.5 TB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 8645HS) vs 4 (Xeon E5-4640 v4). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 5 8645HS) vs 40 (Xeon E5-4640 v4) — the Xeon E5-4640 v4 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Ryzen 5 8645HS) and Intel C612 (Xeon E5-4640 v4).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8645HS | Xeon E5-4640 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-7500+252% | DDR4 2133 MHz |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 1.5 TB+500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 40+100% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen 5 8645HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 5 8645HS) vs true (Xeon E5-4640 v4). The Ryzen 5 8645HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Xeon E5-4640 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 8645HS targets Gaming, Xeon E5-4640 v4 targets Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 8645HS rivals Core i5-13500H.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8645HS | Xeon E5-4640 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 760M | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V (SVM) | true |
| Target Use | Gaming | Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












