
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5800HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 35W, a 29W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Ryzen 7 5800HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 5800HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen 7 5800HS
2021Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,512 vs 19,702).
- ❌483.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 6W.
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 230 moves to FP7/FP7r2/FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 PRO 230 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
2025Ryzen 7 5800HS
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 35W, a 29W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Ryzen 7 5800HS needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 5800HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,512 vs 19,702).
- ❌483.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 6W.
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 230 moves to FP7/FP7r2/FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 PRO 230 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 230 better than Ryzen 7 5800HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 | Ryzen 7 5800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 232 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 | Ryzen 7 5800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 390 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 323 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 250 FPS | 315 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 328 FPS | 457 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 257 FPS | 331 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 279 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 221 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 | Ryzen 7 5800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 493 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 488 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 493 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 370 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 305 FPS | 284 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 | Ryzen 7 5800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 493 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 488 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 493 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 473 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 444 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 381 FPS | 315 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 230 and Ryzen 7 5800HS


Ryzen 5 PRO 230
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,702 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 5800HS
Ryzen 7 5800HS
The Ryzen 7 5800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,512 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 5800HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800HS — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800HS uses Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 scores 19,702 against the Ryzen 7 5800HS's 19,512 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 230. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5800HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 | Ryzen 7 5800HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+11% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+25% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+1100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) | Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) |
| PassMark | 19,702 | 19,512 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,320 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,210 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 uses the FP7/FP7r2/FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800HS uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 | Ryzen 7 5800HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7/FP7r2/FP8 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen 5 PRO 230) / not specified (Ryzen 7 5800HS). The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Ryzen 7 5800HS requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 | Ryzen 7 5800HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 760M | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











