Ryzen 7 1700 vs Ryzen 7 5825C

CPU

GPU

Ryzen 7 1700

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 5825C

8 Cores16 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 1700 vs Ryzen 7 5825C Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 1700

8 / 16

14,772

+1.4%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen 7 5825C

8 / 16

14,561

0.0%

Ryzen Embedded V1756B

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 1700 vs Ryzen 7 5825C FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 1700 vs Ryzen 7 5825C: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 1700

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $260 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅Delivers 189.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 105.5 vs 36.4 PassMark/$ ($140 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅200% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 5825C.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5825C across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,065 vs 9,551).
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 5825C can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 7 5825C

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Ryzen 7 1700 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 36.4 vs 105.5 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 1700.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5825C better than Ryzen 7 1700?

Yes. Ryzen 7 5825C is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 14.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 18.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 5825C is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5825C is the stronger fit. You are getting 18.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 5825C is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 1700 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 7 5825C comes in 185.7% more expensive on MSRP at $400 MSRP versus $140 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 1700 is also 189.9% better value on MSRP (105.5 vs 36.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 5825C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 7 1700 vs Ryzen 7 5825C Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 1700

The Ryzen 7 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,772 points. Launch price was $329.

Ryzen 7 5825C

The Ryzen 7 5825C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,561 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 1700 and Ryzen 7 5825C share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 1700 versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5825C — a 19.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5825C (base: 3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 1700 uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5825C uses Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 1700 scores 14,772 against the Ryzen 7 5825C's 14,561 — a 1.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 1700. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,065 vs 9,551 (16.9% advantage for the Ryzen 7 5825C). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,000 vs 1,961, a 64.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 5825C that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,000 vs 7,145 (35.3% advantage for the Ryzen 7 5825C). L3 cache: 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1700 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5825C.

Feature	Ryzen 7 1700	Ryzen 7 5825C
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	4.5 GHz+22%
Base Clock	3 GHz+50%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	16384 kB	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+700%	512K (per core)
Process	14 nm	7 nm-50%
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023)
PassMark	14,772+1%	14,561
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,065	9,551+18%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,000	1,961+96%
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,000	7,145+43%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 1700 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 5825C uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen 7 1700 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5825C — the Ryzen 7 5825C supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 1700 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 1700) vs 8 (Ryzen 7 5825C) — the Ryzen 7 1700 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B350,X370,B450,X470,A520,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 1700) and SoC (Ryzen 7 5825C).

Feature	Ryzen 7 1700	Ryzen 7 5825C
Socket	AM4	FP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-3200+20%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+100%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	24+200%	8

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 1700) vs Yes (Ryzen 7 5825C). The Ryzen 7 5825C includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Ryzen 7 1700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 1700 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 1700 rivals Core i7-7700K.

Feature	Ryzen 7 1700	Ryzen 7 5825C
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon Vega 8
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	Yes
Target Use	Workstation	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 7 1700 was priced at $140, while the Ryzen 7 5825C came in at $400. On launch pricing ($140 vs $400), Ryzen 7 1700 was $260 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 1700 delivers 105.5 pts/$ vs 36.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5825C — making the Ryzen 7 1700 the 97.4% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 7 1700	Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP	$140-65%	$400
Performance per Dollar	105.5+190%	36.4
Release Date	2017	2022

Search Ryzen 7 1700 on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 5825C on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.