Core i9-10900T vs Ryzen 7 1700

CPU

GPU

Core i9-10900T

10 Cores20 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2020

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 1700

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i9-10900T vs Ryzen 7 1700 Performance Spectrum

Core i9-10900T

10 / 20

14,727

0.0%

14,772

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-10900T vs Ryzen 7 1700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-10900T vs Ryzen 7 1700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-10900T

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($120 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
✅Delivers 16.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 122.7 vs 105.5 PassMark/$ ($120 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 1700.

Ryzen 7 1700

2017

Why buy it

✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i9-10900T.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10900T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,000 vs 7,476).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 105.5 vs 122.7 PassMark/$ ($140 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-10900T better than Ryzen 7 1700?

Yes. Core i9-10900T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 14.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 49.5% better Geekbench multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-10900T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-10900T is the stronger fit. You are getting 49.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-10900T is the better buy right now. Core i9-10900T comes in $20 cheaper on MSRP at $120 MSRP versus $140 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 16.3% better value on MSRP (122.7 vs 105.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 7 1700 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-10900T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017), 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 20 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i9-10900T vs Ryzen 7 1700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10900T

The Core i9-10900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2020 (5 years ago). It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 14,727 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen 7 1700

The Ryzen 7 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,772 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-10900T packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 1700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-10900T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i9-10900T versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 1700 — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900T (base: 1.9 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 1700 is built on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i9-10900T scores 14,727 against the Ryzen 7 1700's 14,772 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 1700. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,710 vs 1,000, a 52.4% lead for the Core i9-10900T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,476 vs 5,000 (39.7% advantage for the Core i9-10900T). L3 cache: 20 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i9-10900T vs 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1700.

Feature	Core i9-10900T	Ryzen 7 1700
Cores / Threads	10 / 20+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+24%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	3 GHz+58%
L3 Cache	20 MB Intel® Smart Cache+25%	16384 kB
L2 Cache	—	4096 kB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	—	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	14,727	14,772
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	8,065
Geekbench 6 Single	1,710+71%	1,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,476+50%	5,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-10900T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 1700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10900T versus DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen 7 1700 — the Core i9-10900T supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i9-10900T) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 1700) — the Ryzen 7 1700 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z490,H470,B460,H410,Z590,B560,H510 (Core i9-10900T) and B350,X370,B450,X470,A520,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 1700).

Feature	Core i9-10900T	Ryzen 7 1700
Socket	LGA1200	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933+10%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	24+50%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: Yes (Core i9-10900T) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 1700). The Core i9-10900T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 7 1700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 1700 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 1700 rivals Core i7-7700K.

Feature	Core i9-10900T	Ryzen 7 1700
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	Yes	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-10900T was priced at $120, while the Ryzen 7 1700 came in at $140. On launch pricing ($120 vs $140), Core i9-10900T was $20 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10900T delivers 122.7 pts/$ vs 105.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 1700 — making the Core i9-10900T the 15.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-10900T	Ryzen 7 1700
MSRP	$120-14%	$140
Performance per Dollar	122.7+16%	105.5
Release Date	2020	2017

Search Core i9-10900T on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 1700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.