Core i9-10900T vs Xeon D-1733NT

Intel

Core i9-10900T

10 Cores20 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2020
Core family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon D-1733NT

8 Cores16 Thrd53 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2022
Similar parts
·······

Core i9-10900T vs Xeon D-1733NT Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-10900T vs Xeon D-1733NT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-10900T vs Xeon D-1733NT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-10900T

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +17.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 15 MB).
  • Costs $180 less on MSRP ($120 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 147.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 122.7 vs 49.5 PassMark/$ ($120 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 53W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (14,727 vs 14,849).

Xeon D-1733NT

2022

Why buy it

  • +0.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10900T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 20 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 49.5 vs 122.7 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
  • 51.4% higher power demand at 53W vs 35W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i9-10900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-10900T better than Xeon D-1733NT?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1733NT makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-10900T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1733NT is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i9-10900T is the better buy right now. Core i9-10900T comes in $180 cheaper on MSRP at $120 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon D-1733NT is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. It is also 147.9% better value on MSRP (122.7 vs 49.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon D-1733NT makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i9-10900T vs Xeon D-1733NT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i9-10900T

The Core i9-10900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2020 (5 years ago). It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 14,727 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon D-1733NT

The Xeon D-1733NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,849 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i9-10900T packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon D-1733NT offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-10900T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i9-10900T versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-1733NT — a 39% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900T (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). In PassMark, the Core i9-10900T scores 14,727 against the Xeon D-1733NT's 14,849 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon D-1733NT. L3 cache: 20 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i9-10900T vs 15 MB on the Xeon D-1733NT.

FeatureCore i9-10900TXeon D-1733NT
Cores / Threads
10 / 20+25%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz+48%
3.1 GHz
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
2 GHz+5%
L3 Cache
20 MB Intel® Smart Cache+33%
15 MB
Process
14 nm
10 nm-29%
PassMark
14,727
14,849
Geekbench 6 Single
1,710
Geekbench 6 Multi
7,476
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-10900T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1733NT uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i9-10900TXeon D-1733NT
Socket
LGA1200
FCBGA2227
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i9-10900T) / not specified (Xeon D-1733NT). The Core i9-10900T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon D-1733NT requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore i9-10900TXeon D-1733NT
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 630
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-10900T was priced at $120, while the Xeon D-1733NT came in at $300. On launch pricing ($120 vs $300), Core i9-10900T was $180 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10900T delivers 122.7 pts/$ vs 49.5 pts/$ for the Xeon D-1733NT — making the Core i9-10900T the 85% better value option.

FeatureCore i9-10900TXeon D-1733NT
MSRP
$120-60%
$300
Performance per Dollar
122.7+148%
49.5
Release Date
2020
2022

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.