Core i9-10900T
VS
EPYC 7251

Core i9-10900T vs EPYC 7251

Intel

Core i9-10900T

10 Cores20 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2020
VS
AMD

EPYC 7251

8 Cores16 Thrd120 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i9-10900T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
106%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
100%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
73%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
22%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
17%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
15%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
9%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
9%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
8%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
8%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
8%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
8%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
7%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
7%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
7%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
7%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
7%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7251

#153
EPYC 7303P
MSRP: $594|Avg: $594
103%
#155
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
MSRP: $799|Avg: $999
102%
#165
EPYC 7251
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#169
Xeon E-2356G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $544
99%
#171
Xeon W-2140B
MSRP: $294|Avg: $99
99%
#176
Xeon 6325P
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#178
Xeon Silver 4510
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
97%
#179
Xeon W-3223
MSRP: $294|Avg: $294
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 7251 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i9-10900TEPYC 7251
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Legacy / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i9-10900T ($5), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($5 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i9-10900TEPYC 7251
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-10900T and EPYC 7251

Intel

Core i9-10900T

The Core i9-10900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2020 (5 years ago). It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 14,727 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

EPYC 7251

The EPYC 7251 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,935 points. Launch price was $574.

Processing Power

The Core i9-10900T packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 7251 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-10900T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i9-10900T versus 2.9 GHz on the EPYC 7251 — a 45.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900T (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 7251 is built on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i9-10900T scores 14,727 against the EPYC 7251's 14,935 — a 1.4% lead for the EPYC 7251. L3 cache: 20 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i9-10900T vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7251.

FeatureCore i9-10900TEPYC 7251
Cores / Threads
10 / 20+25%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz+59%
2.9 GHz
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
2.1 GHz+11%
L3 Cache
20 MB Intel® Smart Cache
32 MB (total)+60%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Naples (2017−2018)
PassMark
14,727
14,935+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,710
Geekbench 6 Multi
7,476
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-10900T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 7251 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i9-10900TEPYC 7251
Socket
LGA1200
TR4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i9-10900T) / not specified (EPYC 7251). The Core i9-10900T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 630), while the EPYC 7251 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore i9-10900TEPYC 7251
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 630
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes