Ryzen 7 1700 vs Xeon Silver 4116

Ryzen 7 1700 vs Xeon Silver 4116 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 1700

8 / 16

14,772

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon Silver 4116

12 / 24

14,918

+1.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 1700 vs Xeon Silver 4116 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 1700 vs Xeon Silver 4116: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 1700

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Silver 4116.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4116 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,772 vs 14,918).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4116, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $140 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4116 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Silver 4116

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 1700.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Silver 4116 better than Ryzen 7 1700?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Silver 4116 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 1700 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Silver 4116 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4116 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Silver 4116 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 1700 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Silver 4116 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $140 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 1700 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (105.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 1700 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Ryzen 7 1700 vs Xeon Silver 4116 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 1700

The Ryzen 7 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,772 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon Silver 4116

The Xeon Silver 4116 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 14,918 points. Launch price was $1,002.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 1700 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4116 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Silver 4116 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 1700 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4116 — a 20.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 1700 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 1700 uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4116 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 1700 scores 14,772 against the Xeon Silver 4116's 14,918 — a 1% lead for the Xeon Silver 4116. L3 cache: 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1700 vs 16.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4116.

Feature	Ryzen 7 1700	Xeon Silver 4116
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+23%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+43%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	16384 kB	16.5 MB (total)+3%
L2 Cache	4096 kB+300%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	14,772	14,918
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,065	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,000	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 1700 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4116 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 7 1700	Xeon Silver 4116
Socket	AM4	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	24	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 1700) / not specified (Xeon Silver 4116). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 1700 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 1700 rivals Core i7-7700K.