Ryzen 7 250
VS
Core Ultra 7 165H

Ryzen 7 250 vs Core Ultra 7 165H

AMD

Ryzen 7 250

8 Cores16 Thrd28 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 7 165H

16 Cores22 Thrd0 WWMax: 5 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 165H

#119
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
MSRP: $400|Avg: $380
105%
#120
Core i7-11850HE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $75
103%
#124
Core i5-1240P
MSRP: $309|Avg: $200
102%
#125
Core i7-13700H
MSRP: $502|Avg: N/A
101%
#128
Core Ultra 7 165H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Ryzen 7 250 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core Ultra 7 165H is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightRyzen 7 250Core Ultra 7 165H
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Meteor Lake-H (2023) / 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen 7 250Core Ultra 7 165H
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 250 and Core Ultra 7 165H

AMD

Ryzen 7 250

The Ryzen 7 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,677 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Core Ultra 7 165H

The Core Ultra 7 165H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,849 points. Launch price was $460.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 250 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 165H offers 16 cores / 22 threads — the Core Ultra 7 165H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 250 versus 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 165H — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 250 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 250 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 165H uses Meteor Lake-H (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 250 scores 25,677 against the Core Ultra 7 165H's 25,849 — a 0.7% lead for the Core Ultra 7 165H. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 250 vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 165H.

FeatureRyzen 7 250Core Ultra 7 165H
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
16 / 22+100%
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+2%
5 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz
3.8 GHz+15%
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
24 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+100%
Process
4 nm-43%
7 nm
Architecture
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
Meteor Lake-H (2023)
PassMark
25,677
25,849
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 250 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 7 165H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 7 250Core Ultra 7 165H
Socket
FP8
FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%