Ryzen 7 250
VS
Xeon Gold 6230

Ryzen 7 250 vs Xeon Gold 6230

AMD

Ryzen 7 250

8 Cores16 Thrd28 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6230

20 Cores40 Thrd125 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Gold 6230

#21
Xeon Platinum 8260M
MSRP: $7705|Avg: N/A
117%
#22
Xeon Platinum 8268
MSRP: $6302|Avg: N/A
117%
#24
Xeon Gold 6130H
MSRP: $1894|Avg: N/A
113%
#32
Xeon Gold 6230
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#41
Xeon W-2195
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 7 250 (2025) utilizes 4 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen 7 250Xeon Gold 6230
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon Gold 6230 (2019) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-2933, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen 7 250Xeon Gold 6230
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 250 and Xeon Gold 6230

AMD

Ryzen 7 250

The Ryzen 7 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,677 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6230

The Xeon Gold 6230 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 26,076 points. Launch price was $1,894.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 250 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6230 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6230 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 250 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6230 — a 26.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 250 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 250 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6230 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 250 scores 25,677 against the Xeon Gold 6230's 26,076 — a 1.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6230. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 250 vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6230.

FeatureRyzen 7 250Xeon Gold 6230
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
20 / 40+150%
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+31%
3.9 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz+57%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
27.5 MB+72%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
20 MB+1900%
Process
4 nm-71%
14 nm
Architecture
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark
25,677
26,076+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi
22,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,419
Geekbench 6 Multi
14,529
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 250 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6230 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 7 250Xeon Gold 6230
Socket
FP8
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
1024 GB
RAM Channels
6
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
48
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 250) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6230). Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6230 targets Server / Multi-thread computing. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6230 rivals EPYC 7352.

FeatureRyzen 7 250Xeon Gold 6230
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Server / Multi-thread computing