
Ryzen 7 250

Xeon W-3235
Ryzen 7 250 vs Xeon W-3235 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 7 250 vs Xeon W-3235 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 7 250 vs Xeon W-3235: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 7 250
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 180W, a 152W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 19 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3235, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Xeon W-3235
2019Why buy it
- ✅+20.3% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 250 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,552 vs 25,677).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,538 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 250 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌542.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 250 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 250 better than Xeon W-3235?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 250 vs Xeon W-3235 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 7 250
The Ryzen 7 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,677 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-3235
The Xeon W-3235 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 25,552 points. Launch price was $1,398.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 250 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-3235 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon W-3235 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 250 versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-3235 — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 250 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 250 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-3235 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 250 scores 25,677 against the Xeon W-3235's 25,552 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 250. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 250 vs 19.25 MB on the Xeon W-3235.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 250 | Xeon W-3235 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+13% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 19.25 MB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 12 MB+1100% |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point (2024−2025) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 25,677 | 25,552 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 250 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3235 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 250 | Xeon W-3235 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 7 250 was priced at $0, while the Xeon W-3235 came in at $1538. On launch pricing ($0 vs $1538), Ryzen 7 250 was $1538 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 250 | Xeon W-3235 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $1538 |
| Performance per Dollar | — | 16.6 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














