
Ryzen 7 2700E

Ryzen 7 5825C
Ryzen 7 2700E vs Ryzen 7 5825C Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 7 2700E vs Ryzen 7 5825C FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 7 2700E vs Ryzen 7 5825C: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 7 2700E
2018Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 22.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.6 vs 36.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5825C across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 5825C can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 5825C
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Ryzen 7 2700E needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,561 vs 14,657).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 36.4 vs 44.6 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5825C better than Ryzen 7 2700E?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 2700E vs Ryzen 7 5825C Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 7 2700E
The Ryzen 7 2700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,657 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 7 5825C
The Ryzen 7 5825C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,561 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 2700E and Ryzen 7 5825C share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 2700E versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5825C — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5825C (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 2700E uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5825C uses Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 2700E scores 14,657 against the Ryzen 7 5825C's 14,561 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 2700E. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700E | Ryzen 7 5825C |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4.5 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+40% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm | 7 nm-42% |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 14,657 | 14,561 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,551 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,961 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 7,145 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 2700E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 5825C uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700E | Ryzen 7 5825C |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 8 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 2700E) / Yes (Ryzen 7 5825C). The Ryzen 7 5825C includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Ryzen 7 2700E requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700E | Ryzen 7 5825C |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Vega 8 |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 7 2700E was priced at $329, while the Ryzen 7 5825C came in at $400. On launch pricing ($329 vs $400), Ryzen 7 2700E was $71 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 2700E delivers 44.6 pts/$ vs 36.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5825C — making the Ryzen 7 2700E the 20.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700E | Ryzen 7 5825C |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-18% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.6+23% | 36.4 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













