Ryzen 7 2700E vs Xeon E5-1681 V3

Ryzen 7 2700E vs Xeon E5-1681 V3 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 2700E

8 / 16

14,657

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-1681 V3

10 / 20

14,820

+1.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 2700E vs Xeon E5-1681 V3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 2700E vs Xeon E5-1681 V3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 2700E

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,260 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,589 MSRP).
✅Delivers 377.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.6 vs 9.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,589 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 135W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,657 vs 14,820).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-1681 V3, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-1681 V3

2014

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 2700E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.3 vs 44.6 PassMark/$ ($1,589 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 135W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 2700E better than Xeon E5-1681 V3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-1681 V3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 2700E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1681 V3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 2700E is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 2700E comes in $1,260 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $1,589 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-1681 V3 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.1% better PassMark. It is also 377.7% better value on MSRP (44.6 vs 9.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 2700E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 7 2700E vs Xeon E5-1681 V3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 2700E

The Ryzen 7 2700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,657 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-1681 V3

The Xeon E5-1681 V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 14,820 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 2700E packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-1681 V3 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-1681 V3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 2700E versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-1681 V3 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 2700E (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen 7 2700E uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-1681 V3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 2700E scores 14,657 against the Xeon E5-1681 V3's 14,820 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon E5-1681 V3. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 2700E vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1681 V3.

Feature	Ryzen 7 2700E	Xeon E5-1681 V3
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+14%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	2.9 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	25 MB (total)+56%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	12 nm-45%	22 nm
Architecture	Zen+ (2018−2019)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	14,657	14,820+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,050
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	9,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 2700E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1681 V3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 7 2700E	Xeon E5-1681 V3
Socket	AM4	LGA2011-3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity	—	768 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 2700E) / Yes (Xeon E5-1681 V3).

Feature	Ryzen 7 2700E	Xeon E5-1681 V3
Integrated GPU	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	Yes

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 7 2700E was priced at $329, while the Xeon E5-1681 V3 came in at $1589. On launch pricing ($329 vs $1589), Ryzen 7 2700E was $1260 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 2700E delivers 44.6 pts/$ vs 9.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1681 V3 — making the Ryzen 7 2700E the 130.8% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 7 2700E	Xeon E5-1681 V3
MSRP	$329-79%	$1589
Performance per Dollar	44.6+380%	9.3
Release Date	2018	2014

Search Ryzen 7 2700E on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-1681 V3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.