Core i9-10900T
VS
Ryzen 7 2700E

Core i9-10900T vs Ryzen 7 2700E

Intel

Core i9-10900T

10 Cores20 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2020
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 2700E

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 4 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i9-10900T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
106%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
100%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
73%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
22%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
17%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
15%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
9%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
9%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
8%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
8%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
8%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
8%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
7%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
7%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
7%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
7%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
7%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 2700E

#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
110%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
110%
#346
Core i7-10700K
MSRP: $387|Avg: $380
110%
#347
Celeron G5905T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
106%
#348
Athlon PRO 200GE
MSRP: $55|Avg: $81
106%
#349
Core i5-9600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $219
106%
#350
Core i3-8300
MSRP: $138|Avg: $136
105%
#351
Core i5-8500B
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
104%
#352
Core i7-13700TE
MSRP: $390|Avg: $476
104%
#353
Core i9-11900T
MSRP: $439|Avg: $413
101%
#354
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
101%
#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
101%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
101%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
100%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
100%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
100%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
100%
#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
99%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
98%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
98%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
97%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
97%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
96%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
96%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
93%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
93%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
88%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
87%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
86%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i9-10900T delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Ryzen 7 2700E in both compute-intensive tasks (0.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i9-10900TRyzen 7 2700E
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($5)
⚠️ Higher cost ($329)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Legacy / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Zen+ (2018−2019) / 12 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: The Core i9-10900T leads not only in performance but also in value. It is effectively 98% cheaper ($5 vs $329) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i9-10900TRyzen 7 2700E
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+6511%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($5)
⚠️ Higher cost ($329)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-10900T and Ryzen 7 2700E

Intel

Core i9-10900T

The Core i9-10900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2020 (5 years ago). It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 14,727 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Ryzen 7 2700E

The Ryzen 7 2700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,657 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i9-10900T packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 2700E offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-10900T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i9-10900T versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 2700E — a 14% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900T (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 2700E is built on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i9-10900T scores 14,727 against the Ryzen 7 2700E's 14,657 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i9-10900T. L3 cache: 20 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i9-10900T vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 2700E.

FeatureCore i9-10900TRyzen 7 2700E
Cores / Threads
10 / 20+25%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz+15%
4 GHz
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
2.8 GHz+47%
L3 Cache
20 MB Intel® Smart Cache+25%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
Process
14 nm
12 nm-14%
Architecture
Zen+ (2018−2019)
PassMark
14,727
14,657
Geekbench 6 Single
1,710
Geekbench 6 Multi
7,476
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-10900T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 2700E uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i9-10900TRyzen 7 2700E
Socket
LGA1200
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i9-10900T) / not specified (Ryzen 7 2700E). The Core i9-10900T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 7 2700E requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore i9-10900TRyzen 7 2700E
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 630
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i9-10900T launched at $120 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 2700E debuted at $329. At current prices ($5 vs $329), the Core i9-10900T is $324 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10900T delivers 2945.4 pts/$ vs 44.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 2700E — making the Core i9-10900T the 194% better value option.

FeatureCore i9-10900TRyzen 7 2700E
MSRP
$120-64%
$329
Avg Price (30d)
$5-98%
$329
Performance per Dollar
2945.4+6504%
44.6
Release Date
2020
2018