
Core i9-10900T

Ryzen 7 2700E
Core i9-10900T vs Ryzen 7 2700E Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-10900T vs Ryzen 7 2700E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-10900T vs Ryzen 7 2700E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-10900T
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $209 less on MSRP ($120 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 175.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 122.7 vs 44.6 PassMark/$ ($120 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 7 2700E
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10900T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,657 vs 14,727).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.6 vs 122.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-10900T better than Ryzen 7 2700E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-10900T vs Ryzen 7 2700E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10900T
The Core i9-10900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2020 (5 years ago). It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 14,727 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 7 2700E
The Ryzen 7 2700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,657 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10900T packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 2700E offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-10900T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i9-10900T versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 2700E — a 14% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900T (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 2700E is built on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i9-10900T scores 14,727 against the Ryzen 7 2700E's 14,657 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i9-10900T. L3 cache: 20 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i9-10900T vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 2700E.
| Feature | Core i9-10900T | Ryzen 7 2700E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+15% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.9 GHz | 2.8 GHz+47% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB Intel® Smart Cache+25% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | — | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 12 nm-14% |
| Architecture | — | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 14,727 | 14,657 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,710 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,476 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10900T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 2700E uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-10900T | Ryzen 7 2700E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i9-10900T) / not specified (Ryzen 7 2700E). The Core i9-10900T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 7 2700E requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i9-10900T | Ryzen 7 2700E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-10900T was priced at $120, while the Ryzen 7 2700E came in at $329. On launch pricing ($120 vs $329), Core i9-10900T was $209 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10900T delivers 122.7 pts/$ vs 44.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 2700E — making the Core i9-10900T the 93.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-10900T | Ryzen 7 2700E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $120-64% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 122.7+175% | 44.6 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














