
Ryzen 7 2700E

Xeon W-1290TE
Ryzen 7 2700E vs Xeon W-1290TE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 7 2700E vs Xeon W-1290TE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 7 2700E vs Xeon W-1290TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 7 2700E
2018Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $223 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $552 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 69.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.6 vs 26.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $552 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1290TE, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 16 PCIe lanes.
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon W-1290TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Xeon W-1290TE
2020Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 16 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics P630, while Ryzen 7 2700E needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,505 vs 14,657).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.3 vs 44.6 PassMark/$ ($552 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-1290TE better than Ryzen 7 2700E?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 2700E vs Xeon W-1290TE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 7 2700E
The Ryzen 7 2700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,657 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon W-1290TE
The Xeon W-1290TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,505 points. Launch price was $552.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 2700E packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-1290TE offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon W-1290TE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 2700E versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-1290TE — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1290TE (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 2700E uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon W-1290TE uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 2700E scores 14,657 against the Xeon W-1290TE's 14,505 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 7 2700E. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 2700E vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1290TE.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700E | Xeon W-1290TE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 10 / 20+25% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4.5 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+56% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 14,657+1% | 14,505 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,507 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,478 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 2700E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-1290TE uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700E | Xeon W-1290TE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 2700E) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-1290TE). The Xeon W-1290TE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics P630), while the Ryzen 7 2700E requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon W-1290TE targets Workstation.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700E | Xeon W-1290TE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 7 2700E was priced at $329, while the Xeon W-1290TE came in at $552. On launch pricing ($329 vs $552), Ryzen 7 2700E was $223 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 2700E delivers 44.6 pts/$ vs 26.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1290TE — making the Ryzen 7 2700E the 51.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700E | Xeon W-1290TE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-40% | $552 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.6+70% | 26.3 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













