Ryzen 7 3700U
VS
Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

Ryzen 7 3700U vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

AMD

Ryzen 7 3700U

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 4 GHz2019
VS
AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
3217%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
607%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
540%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
417%
#143
Xeon W-1350P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $250
98%
#145
Xeon 6511P
MSRP: $815|Avg: $815
97%
#168
Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
MSRP: $110|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Ryzen 7 3700U leads in gaming performance. However, the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.8% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightRyzen 7 3700URyzen 3 PRO 1300
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($110)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) / 12 nm)
✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen 7 3700URyzen 3 PRO 1300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($110)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700U and Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

AMD

Ryzen 7 3700U

The Ryzen 7 3700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,049 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

The Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 7,106 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700U versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700U (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700U uses the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture (12 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700U scores 7,049 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300's 7,106 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 3700U vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300.

FeatureRyzen 7 3700URyzen 3 PRO 1300
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
4 GHz+14%
3.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz+39%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512K (per core)
Process
12 nm-14%
14 nm
Architecture
Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)
Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark
7,049
7,106
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,826
Geekbench 6 Single
794
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,115
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 7 3700URyzen 3 PRO 1300
Socket
FP5
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 3700U) / not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 1300). The Ryzen 7 3700U includes integrated graphics (Radeon RX Vega 10), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 3700U targets Mainstream Laptop.

FeatureRyzen 7 3700URyzen 3 PRO 1300
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon RX Vega 10
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop