PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,810 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $3,139 MSRP).
✅Delivers 497.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 11.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $3,139 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 35,801).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6338T, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 6338T

2021

Why buy it

✅+59.6% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($3,139 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Xeon Gold 6338T

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,810 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $3,139 MSRP).
✅Delivers 497.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 11.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $3,139 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+59.6% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 35,801).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6338T, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($3,139 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon Gold 6338T?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Gold 6338T makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6338T is the better fit. You are getting 59.6% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 3700X is $2,810 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $3,139 MSRP, and it gives you a 16.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon Gold 6338T is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 59.6% better PassMark. It is also 497.8% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 11.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6338T is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019), more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmark Check

Xeon Gold 6338T Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon Gold 6338T
1080p
low	200 FPS	185 FPS
medium	163 FPS	149 FPS
high	137 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	94 FPS
1440p
low	156 FPS	154 FPS
medium	121 FPS	120 FPS
high	100 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	74 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	72 FPS
medium	71 FPS	60 FPS
high	56 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	38 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon Gold 6338T

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon Gold 6338T
1080p
low	561 FPS	232 FPS
medium	525 FPS	208 FPS
high	428 FPS	172 FPS
ultra	383 FPS	139 FPS
1440p
low	545 FPS	199 FPS
medium	471 FPS	180 FPS
high	394 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	119 FPS
4K
low	350 FPS	124 FPS
medium	304 FPS	114 FPS
high	274 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	81 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon Gold 6338T

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon Gold 6338T
1080p
low	561 FPS	895 FPS
medium	561 FPS	817 FPS
high	561 FPS	766 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	680 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	746 FPS
medium	561 FPS	643 FPS
high	538 FPS	603 FPS
ultra	470 FPS	535 FPS
4K
low	499 FPS	479 FPS
medium	394 FPS	378 FPS
high	343 FPS	334 FPS
ultra	275 FPS	272 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon Gold 6338T

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon Gold 6338T
1080p
low	561 FPS	895 FPS
medium	561 FPS	813 FPS
high	561 FPS	698 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	600 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	701 FPS
medium	561 FPS	616 FPS
high	561 FPS	527 FPS
ultra	555 FPS	451 FPS
4K
low	561 FPS	506 FPS
medium	501 FPS	452 FPS
high	447 FPS	396 FPS
ultra	396 FPS	344 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon Gold 6338T

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon Gold 6338T

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon Gold 6338T

The Xeon Gold 6338T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 35,801 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6338T offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6338T has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6338T — a 25.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6338T uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon Gold 6338T's 35,801 — a 45.9% lead for the Xeon Gold 6338T. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 36 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6338T.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon Gold 6338T
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	24 / 48+200%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+29%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+71%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB	36 MB (total)+13%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	22,430	35,801+60%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6338T uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3200 on the Xeon Gold 6338T — the Xeon Gold 6338T supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6338T supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6338T). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6338T) — the Xeon Gold 6338T offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6338T).

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon Gold 6338T
Socket	AM4	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	3200+79900%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+2184433%	6144
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	64+167%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6338T). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6338T rivals EPYC 7443P.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon Gold 6338T
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6338T debuted at $3139. On MSRP ($329 vs $3139), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $2810 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 11.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6338T — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 142.7% better value option.