Ryzen 7 5800X vs EPYC 9375F
Ryzen 7 5800X
EPYC 9375F
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 5800X
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9375F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 7 5800X | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) | ✅ More affordable ($108) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) / 7 nm, 12 nm) | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 7 5800X | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+476%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) | ✅ More affordable ($108) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5800X and EPYC 9375F
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.
EPYC 9375F
The EPYC 9375F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,768 points. Launch price was $5,306.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5800X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 9375F offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 9375F has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X versus 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9375F — a 2.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 9375F (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.85 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the EPYC 9375F uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5800X scores 27,712 against the EPYC 9375F's 95,768 — a 110.2% lead for the EPYC 9375F. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9375F.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 32 / 64+300% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz | 4.8 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz | 3.85 GHz+1% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 256 MB (total)+700% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 27,712 | 95,768+246% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,981 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 26,020 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9375F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5800X versus DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9375F — the EPYC 9375F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 5800X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5800X) vs 12 (EPYC 9375F). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5800X) vs 128 (EPYC 9375F) — the EPYC 9375F offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 5800X) and SP5 (EPYC 9375F).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6000+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 6 TB+4700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 12+500% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9375F). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop, EPYC 9375F targets Data Center / Frequency Optimized. Direct competitor: EPYC 9375F rivals Xeon 6766E.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Desktop | Data Center / Frequency Optimized |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5800X launched at $449 MSRP, while the EPYC 9375F debuted at $5306. At current prices ($180 vs $108), the EPYC 9375F is $72 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5800X delivers 154.0 pts/$ vs 886.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 9375F — making the EPYC 9375F the 140.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449-92% | $5306 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $180 | $108-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 154.0 | 886.7+476% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 7 5800X and EPYC 9375F
