
Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 9375F

Core i5-13400F

EPYC 9375F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13400F
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9375F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-13400F | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) | ✅ More affordable ($108) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-13400F | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+538%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) | ✅ More affordable ($108) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and EPYC 9375F

Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

EPYC 9375F
The EPYC 9375F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,768 points. Launch price was $5,306.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 9375F offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 9375F has 22 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9375F — a 4.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9375F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.85 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 9375F uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the EPYC 9375F's 95,768 — a 117.1% lead for the EPYC 9375F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,981, a 21.3% lead for the EPYC 9375F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 26,020 (78.1% advantage for the EPYC 9375F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9375F.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 32 / 64+220% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.8 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.85 GHz+54% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+1180% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 25,029 | 95,768+283% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | 2,981+24% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | 26,020+128% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 9375F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 12 (EPYC 9375F). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 128 (EPYC 9375F) — the EPYC 9375F offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and SP5 (EPYC 9375F).
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 6 TB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 12+500% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9375F). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, EPYC 9375F targets Data Center / Frequency Optimized. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; EPYC 9375F rivals Xeon 6766E.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Gaming | Data Center / Frequency Optimized |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the EPYC 9375F debuted at $5306. At current prices ($180 vs $108), the EPYC 9375F is $72 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 139.1 pts/$ vs 886.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 9375F — making the EPYC 9375F the 145.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | EPYC 9375F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196-96% | $5306 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $180 | $108-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 139.1 | 886.7+537% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















