Ryzen 7 6800HS vs Xeon E5-2698 v4

Ryzen 7 6800HS vs Xeon E5-2698 v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 6800HS

8 / 16

22,652

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2698 v4

20 / 40

22,764

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 6800HS vs Xeon E5-2698 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 6800HS vs Xeon E5-2698 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 6800HS

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,652 vs 22,764).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 50 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2698 v4, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads.

Xeon E5-2698 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 6800HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 6800HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 6800HS better than Xeon E5-2698 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2698 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 6800HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2698 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 212.5% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 6800HS still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 7 6800HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 6800HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2016) and a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 7 6800HS vs Xeon E5-2698 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 6800HS

The Ryzen 7 6800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,652 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2698 v4

The Xeon E5-2698 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 50 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 22,764 points. Launch price was $3,226.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 6800HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2698 v4 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon E5-2698 v4 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 6800HS versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2698 v4 — a 26.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 6800HS (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 6800HS uses the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon E5-2698 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 6800HS scores 22,652 against the Xeon E5-2698 v4's 22,764 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-2698 v4. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 6800HS vs 50 MB on the Xeon E5-2698 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 7 6800HS	Xeon E5-2698 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	20 / 40+150%
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+31%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+45%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	50 MB+213%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+10140%	5 MB
Process	6 nm-57%	14 nm
Architecture	Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	22,652	22,764

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 6800HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2698 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.