Ryzen 7 6800HS vs Xeon E5-4640 v4

Ryzen 7 6800HS vs Xeon E5-4640 v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 6800HS

8 / 16

22,652

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-4640 v4

12 / 24

22,559

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 6800HS vs Xeon E5-4640 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 6800HS vs Xeon E5-4640 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 6800HS

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4640 v4, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-4640 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 6800HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,559 vs 22,652).
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,837 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 6800HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 6800HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 6800HS better than Xeon E5-4640 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4640 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 6800HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 6800HS is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 6800HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 6800HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-4640 v4 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 7 6800HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,837 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-4640 v4 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 6800HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2016), a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 12/24. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 7 6800HS vs Xeon E5-4640 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 6800HS

The Ryzen 7 6800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,652 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-4640 v4

The Xeon E5-4640 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 22,559 points. Launch price was $2,837.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 6800HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-4640 v4 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-4640 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 6800HS versus 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-4640 v4 — a 57.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 6800HS (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 6800HS uses the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon E5-4640 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 6800HS scores 22,652 against the Xeon E5-4640 v4's 22,559 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 6800HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 6800HS vs 30 MB on the Xeon E5-4640 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 7 6800HS	Xeon E5-4640 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+81%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+52%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	30 MB+88%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+16967%	3 MB
Process	6 nm-57%	14 nm
Architecture	Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	22,652	22,559

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 6800HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4640 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 7 6800HS	Xeon E5-4640 v4
Socket	FP7	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4 2133 MHz
Max RAM Capacity	—	1.5 TB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40