Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Ryzen 7 8700F vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

Ryzen 7 8700F

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 5 GHz2024
Ryzen family
······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

24 Cores48 Thrd250 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2018
Threadripper family
··
Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 8700F vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 8700F
8 / 16
31,240
+0.9%
brand logoRyzen 7 4980U
brand logoRyzen 7 PRO 5755GE
brand logoRyzen 7 5700G
brand logoRyzen 7 5800X
brand logoRyzen 9 7900
brand logoRyzen 9 9950X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
24 / 48
30,954
0.0%
brand logoRyzen 5 6600U
brand logoRyzen 7 5800H
brand logoRyzen AI 7 PRO 350
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 1950X
brand logoRyzen 9 7900
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 8700F vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Ryzen 7 8700F
low266 FPS
medium240 FPS
high206 FPS
ultra176 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
low198 FPS
medium177 FPS
high143 FPS
ultra115 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Ryzen 7 8700F
low483 FPS
medium403 FPS
high347 FPS
ultra308 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
low536 FPS
medium483 FPS
high404 FPS
ultra354 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Ryzen 7 8700F
low781 FPS
medium781 FPS
high767 FPS
ultra649 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
low768 FPS
medium640 FPS
high577 FPS
ultra504 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Ryzen 7 8700F
low781 FPS
medium781 FPS
high781 FPS
ultra781 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
low774 FPS
medium774 FPS
high704 FPS
ultra616 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Ryzen 7 8700F
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Ryzen 7 8700F
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra297 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Ryzen 7 8700F
low355 FPS
medium266 FPS
high232 FPS
ultra199 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
low310 FPS
medium235 FPS
high214 FPS
ultra192 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Ryzen 7 8700F
low289 FPS
medium257 FPS
high197 FPS
ultra156 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
low298 FPS
medium269 FPS
high216 FPS
ultra175 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Ryzen 7 8700F
low314 FPS
medium259 FPS
high218 FPS
ultra190 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
low316 FPS
medium278 FPS
high255 FPS
ultra215 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Ryzen 7 8700F
low240 FPS
medium221 FPS
high184 FPS
ultra171 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
low277 FPS
medium259 FPS
high218 FPS
ultra206 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Ryzen 7 8700F vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 8700F

2024

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅Costs $1,029 less on MSRP ($270 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 385.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 115.7 vs 23.8 PassMark/$ ($270 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 65W instead of 250W, a 185W reduction.
  • ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,040 vs 29,045).
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
  • ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

2018

Why buy it

  • ✅+61% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
  • ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
  • ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
  • ✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8700F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.8 vs 115.7 PassMark/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
  • ❌284.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 65W.
  • ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8700F moves to AM5 and DDR5.
  • ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 8700F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 8700F better than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 8700F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is the stronger fit. You are getting 61% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 8700F is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 8700F comes in $1,029 cheaper on MSRP at $270 MSRP versus $1,299 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 61% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. It is also 385.6% better value on MSRP (115.7 vs 23.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 8700F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2018), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of TR4, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 7 8700F vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen 7 8700F

The Ryzen 7 8700F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,240 points. Launch price was $270.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

The Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,954 points. Launch price was $1,299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 8700F packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8700F versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX — a 17.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F (base: 4.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 8700F uses the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 8700F scores 31,240 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX's 30,954 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 8700F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,040 vs 29,045 (46.7% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,649 vs 1,240, a 72.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 8700F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,500 vs 7,241 (60.4% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8700F vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.

FeatureRyzen 7 8700FRyzen Threadripper 2970WX
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
24 / 48+200%
Boost Clock
5 GHz+19%
4.2 GHz
Base Clock
4.1 GHz+37%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
64 MB+300%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
512K (per core)+51100%
Process
4 nm-67%
12 nm
Architecture
Phoenix (2023−2024)
Zen+ (2018−2019)
PassMark
31,240
30,954
Cinebench R23 Multi
18,040
29,045+61%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,649+114%
1,240
Geekbench 6 Multi
13,500+86%
7,241
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 8700F uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 8700F versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX — the Ryzen 7 8700F supports 77.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 8700F) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 8700F) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: XB650,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 8700F) and X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX).

FeatureRyzen 7 8700FRyzen Threadripper 2970WX
Socket
AM5
TR4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5200+77%
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
2048 GB+700%
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
64+220%
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 8700F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 8700F targets High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU, Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX targets Extreme Multi-threaded Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 8700F rivals Core i7-14700F; Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX rivals Core i9-7940X.

FeatureRyzen 7 8700FRyzen Threadripper 2970WX
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
AMD-V
Target Use
High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU
Extreme Multi-threaded Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 7 8700F was priced at $270, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX came in at $1299. On launch pricing ($270 vs $1299), Ryzen 7 8700F was $1029 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 8700F delivers 115.7 pts/$ vs 23.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX — making the Ryzen 7 8700F the 131.7% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 7 8700FRyzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP
$270-79%
$1299
Performance per Dollar
115.7+386%
23.8
Release Date
2024
2018
Search Ryzen 7 8700F on AmazonSearch Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.