PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 8700F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,029 less on MSRP ($270 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 385.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 115.7 vs 23.8 PassMark/$ ($270 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 250W, a 185W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,040 vs 29,045).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

2018

Why buy it

✅+61% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8700F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.8 vs 115.7 PassMark/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
❌284.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8700F moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 8700F.

Ryzen 7 8700F

2024

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,029 less on MSRP ($270 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 385.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 115.7 vs 23.8 PassMark/$ ($270 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 250W, a 185W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+61% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,040 vs 29,045).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8700F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.8 vs 115.7 PassMark/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
❌284.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8700F moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 8700F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 8700F better than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 8700F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is the better fit. You are getting 61% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 8700F is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 8700F is $1,029 cheaper on MSRP at $270 MSRP versus $1,299 MSRP, and it gives you a 20.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 61% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. It is also 385.6% better value on MSRP (115.7 vs 23.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 8700F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2018), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of TR4, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 8700F Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 8700F	Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
1080p
low	266 FPS	198 FPS
medium	240 FPS	177 FPS
high	206 FPS	143 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	115 FPS
1440p
low	233 FPS	160 FPS
medium	190 FPS	134 FPS
high	158 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	85 FPS
4K
low	158 FPS	73 FPS
medium	131 FPS	64 FPS
high	102 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	41 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 8700F Open Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 8700F	Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
1080p
low	483 FPS	536 FPS
medium	403 FPS	483 FPS
high	347 FPS	404 FPS
ultra	308 FPS	354 FPS
1440p
low	423 FPS	473 FPS
medium	374 FPS	424 FPS
high	322 FPS	360 FPS
ultra	273 FPS	299 FPS
4K
low	283 FPS	295 FPS
medium	259 FPS	265 FPS
high	244 FPS	242 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	213 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 8700F Open Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 8700F	Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
1080p
low	781 FPS	768 FPS
medium	781 FPS	640 FPS
high	767 FPS	577 FPS
ultra	649 FPS	504 FPS
1440p
low	766 FPS	640 FPS
medium	629 FPS	533 FPS
high	544 FPS	465 FPS
ultra	463 FPS	408 FPS
4K
low	530 FPS	469 FPS
medium	457 FPS	377 FPS
high	402 FPS	336 FPS
ultra	338 FPS	280 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 8700F Open Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 8700F	Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
1080p
low	781 FPS	774 FPS
medium	781 FPS	774 FPS
high	781 FPS	704 FPS
ultra	781 FPS	616 FPS
1440p
low	781 FPS	730 FPS
medium	781 FPS	644 FPS
high	692 FPS	549 FPS
ultra	602 FPS	474 FPS
4K
low	615 FPS	523 FPS
medium	553 FPS	473 FPS
high	495 FPS	419 FPS
ultra	431 FPS	362 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 8700F Open Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 8700F and Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

Ryzen 7 8700F

The Ryzen 7 8700F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,240 points. Launch price was $270.

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

The Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,954 points. Launch price was $1,299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 8700F packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8700F versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX — a 17.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F (base: 4.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 8700F uses the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 8700F scores 31,240 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX's 30,954 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 8700F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,040 vs 29,045 (46.7% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,649 vs 1,240, a 72.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 8700F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,500 vs 7,241 (60.4% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8700F vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.

Feature	Ryzen 7 8700F	Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	24 / 48+200%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+19%	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	4.1 GHz+37%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	64 MB+300%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512K (per core)
Process	4 nm-67%	12 nm
Architecture	Phoenix (2023−2024)	Zen+ (2018−2019)
PassMark	31,240	30,954
Cinebench R23 Multi	18,040	29,045+61%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,649+114%	1,240
Geekbench 6 Multi	13,500+86%	7,241

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 8700F uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 8700F versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX — the Ryzen 7 8700F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 8700F) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 8700F) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: XB650,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 8700F) and X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX).

Feature	Ryzen 7 8700F	Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Socket	AM5	TR4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200+25%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	2048 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	64+220%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 8700F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 8700F targets High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU, Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX targets Extreme Multi-threaded Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 8700F rivals Core i7-14700F; Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX rivals Core i9-7940X.

Feature	Ryzen 7 8700F	Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	AMD-V
Target Use	High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU	Extreme Multi-threaded Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 8700F launched at $270 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX debuted at $1299. On MSRP ($270 vs $1299), the Ryzen 7 8700F is $1029 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 8700F delivers 115.7 pts/$ vs 23.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX — making the Ryzen 7 8700F the 131.7% better value option.