Ryzen 7 8700F
Xeon W-3245
Ryzen 7 8700F vs Xeon W-3245 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 7 8700F vs Xeon W-3245 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 7 8700F vs Xeon W-3245: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 7 8700F
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,929 less on MSRP ($270 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 718.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 115.7 vs 14.1 PassMark/$ ($270 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 22 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3245, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Xeon W-3245
2019Why buy it
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8700F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,000 vs 18,040).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.1 vs 115.7 PassMark/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
- ❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8700F moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 8700F better than Xeon W-3245?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 8700F vs Xeon W-3245 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen 7 8700F
The Ryzen 7 8700F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,240 points. Launch price was $270.
Xeon W-3245
The Xeon W-3245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 31,089 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 8700F packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-3245 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon W-3245 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8700F versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3245 — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F (base: 4.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 8700F uses the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-3245 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 8700F scores 31,240 against the Xeon W-3245's 31,089 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 8700F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,040 vs 18,000 (0.2% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,649 vs 1,353, a 64.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 8700F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,500 vs 11,698 (14.3% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8700F vs 22 MB on the Xeon W-3245.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 8700F | Xeon W-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+9% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.1 GHz+28% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 22 MB+38% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 16 MB+1500% |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix (2023−2024) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 31,240 | 31,089 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,040 | 18,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,649+96% | 1,353 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,500+15% | 11,698 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 8700F uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3245 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 8700F versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-3245 — the Ryzen 7 8700F supports 77.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3245 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 8700F) vs 6 (Xeon W-3245). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 8700F) vs 64 (Xeon W-3245) — the Xeon W-3245 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: XB650,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 8700F) and C621 (Xeon W-3245).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 8700F | Xeon W-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+77% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 1024 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 64+220% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 8700F has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 8700F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-3245). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 8700F targets High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU, Xeon W-3245 targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 8700F rivals Core i7-14700F; Xeon W-3245 rivals Threadripper 2950X.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 8700F | Xeon W-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 7 8700F was priced at $270, while the Xeon W-3245 came in at $2199. On launch pricing ($270 vs $2199), Ryzen 7 8700F was $1929 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 8700F delivers 115.7 pts/$ vs 14.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3245 — making the Ryzen 7 8700F the 156.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 8700F | Xeon W-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $270-88% | $2199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 115.7+721% | 14.1 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 7 8700F and Xeon W-3245
