Ryzen 7 9800X3D vs Core Ultra 7 265T
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Core Ultra 7 265T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 7 9800X3D | Core Ultra 7 265T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($479) | ✅ More affordable ($362) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Granite Ridge (2024−2025) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 7 9800X3D | Core Ultra 7 265T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+35%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($479) | ✅ More affordable ($362) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 9800X3D and Core Ultra 7 265T
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
The Ryzen 7 9800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 November 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 39,966 points. Launch price was $479.
Core Ultra 7 265T
The Core Ultra 7 265T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 40,681 points. Launch price was $384.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 9800X3D packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 265T offers 20 cores / 20 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265T has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 7 9800X3D versus 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265T — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265T (base: 4.7 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 9800X3D uses the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 265T uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D scores 39,966 against the Core Ultra 7 265T's 40,681 — a 1.8% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265T. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 23,277 vs 34,000 (37.4% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265T). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,450 vs 2,954, a 15.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 9800X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,500 vs 16,455 (11.7% advantage for the Ryzen 7 9800X3D). L3 cache: 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 9800X3D vs 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265T.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 9800X3D | Core Ultra 7 265T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 20 / 20+150% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.3 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 4.7 GHz+213% | 1.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 96 MB (total)+220% | 30 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+200% |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm-25% |
| Architecture | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 39,966 | 40,681+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 23,277 | 34,000+46% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,450+17% | 2,954 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,500+12% | 16,455 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 9800X3D uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 7 265T uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 7 9800X3D) vs 24 (Core Ultra 7 265T) — the Ryzen 7 9800X3D offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,B650E,X870E,B850 (Ryzen 7 9800X3D) and Z890,H870,B860 (Core Ultra 7 265T).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 9800X3D | Core Ultra 7 265T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+17% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 9800X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen 7 9800X3D) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265T). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7 9800X3D) and Intel Graphics (Xe-LPG 4-core) (Core Ultra 7 265T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 9800X3D targets Extreme Gaming, Core Ultra 7 265T targets High End Desktop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 9800X3D rivals Core i9-14900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 9800X3D | Core Ultra 7 265T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | Intel Graphics (Xe-LPG 4-core) |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Extreme Gaming | High End Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 9800X3D launched at $479 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 7 265T debuted at $384. At current prices ($479 vs $362), the Core Ultra 7 265T is $117 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 9800X3D delivers 83.4 pts/$ vs 112.4 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 7 265T — making the Core Ultra 7 265T the 29.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 9800X3D | Core Ultra 7 265T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $479 | $384-20% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $479 | $362-24% |
| Performance per Dollar | 83.4 | 112.4+35% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 7 9800X3D and Core Ultra 7 265T
