Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X vs Xeon W-10885M

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X vs Xeon W-10885M Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X

8 / 16

15,570

+0.5%

Ryzen 3 7320U

FX-9590

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U

Ryzen Embedded V3C18I

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

Ryzen 9 8940HX

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon W-10885M

8 / 16

15,486

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X vs Xeon W-10885M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X vs Xeon W-10885M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-10885M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $399 MSRP, while Xeon W-10885M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌4650% higher power demand at 95W vs 2W.

Xeon W-10885M

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 95W, a 93W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (15,486 vs 15,570).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-10885M better than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-10885M makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-10885M is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon W-10885M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $399 MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (39.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-10885M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X vs Xeon W-10885M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X

The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 15,570 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-10885M

The Xeon W-10885M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,486 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X and Xeon W-10885M share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-10885M — a 29.2% clock advantage for the Xeon W-10885M (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-10885M uses Comet Lake-H (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X scores 15,570 against the Xeon W-10885M's 15,486 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X vs 16 MB on the Xeon W-10885M.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X	Xeon W-10885M
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	5.1 GHz+34%
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+42%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	16 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	Comet Lake-H (2020)
PassMark	15,570	15,486

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-10885M uses BGA1440 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.