
Ryzen 7 PRO 250

Xeon W-11955M
Ryzen 7 PRO 250 vs Xeon W-11955M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 7 PRO 250 vs Xeon W-11955M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 7 PRO 250 vs Xeon W-11955M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $223 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $623 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 56.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 54.5 vs 34.8 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $623 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 35W, a 27W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1787 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Xeon W-11955M
2021Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 250 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,702 vs 21,789).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.8 vs 54.5 PassMark/$ ($623 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌337.5% higher power demand at 35W vs 8W.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1787 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 250 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 250 better than Xeon W-11955M?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 PRO 250 vs Xeon W-11955M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 7 PRO 250
The Ryzen 7 PRO 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,789 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-11955M
The Xeon W-11955M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,702 points. Launch price was $623.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 and Xeon W-11955M share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 versus 5 GHz on the Xeon W-11955M — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 250 uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-11955M uses Tiger Lake-H (2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 scores 21,789 against the Xeon W-11955M's 21,702 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 250. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon W-11955M.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+2% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+57% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 24 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+540% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-60% | 10 nm SuperFin |
| Architecture | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) | Tiger Lake-H (2021) |
| PassMark | 21,789 | 21,702 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 PRO 250 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-11955M uses FCBGA1787 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | FCBGA1787 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 was priced at $400, while the Xeon W-11955M came in at $623. On launch pricing ($400 vs $623), Ryzen 7 PRO 250 was $223 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 delivers 54.5 pts/$ vs 34.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-11955M — making the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 the 44% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400-36% | $623 |
| Performance per Dollar | 54.5+57% | 34.8 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













