
Ryzen 5 7400
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 250
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7400
2025Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $171 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 76.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 96.1 vs 54.5 PassMark/$ ($229 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 250 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,789 vs 22,010).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 54.5 vs 96.1 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 7400
2025Ryzen 7 PRO 250
2025Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $171 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 76.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 96.1 vs 54.5 PassMark/$ ($229 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 250 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,789 vs 22,010).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 54.5 vs 96.1 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7400 better than Ryzen 7 PRO 250?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7400 | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7400 | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 296 FPS | 492 FPS |
| medium | 256 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 260 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 230 FPS | 376 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 281 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 214 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7400 | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 550 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 550 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 550 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 550 FPS | 522 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 550 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 550 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 531 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 481 FPS | 449 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 419 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 349 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 297 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 239 FPS | 343 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7400 | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 550 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 550 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 550 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 550 FPS | 545 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 550 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 550 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 550 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 545 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 550 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 510 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 445 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 385 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7400 and Ryzen 7 PRO 250


Ryzen 5 7400
Ryzen 5 7400
The Ryzen 5 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,010 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 250
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
The Ryzen 7 PRO 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,789 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7400 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7400 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 — a 17% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7400 uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7400 scores 22,010 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 250's 21,789 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 5 7400. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7400 vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 250.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7400 | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 5.1 GHz+19% |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 8 MB+700% |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 22,010+1% | 21,789 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7400 uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7400 | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 7400 launched at $229 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 debuted at $400. On MSRP ($229 vs $400), the Ryzen 5 7400 is $171 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 7400 delivers 96.1 pts/$ vs 54.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 — making the Ryzen 5 7400 the 55.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7400 | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229-43% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 96.1+76% | 54.5 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












