
Ryzen 5 7400

Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Ryzen 5 7400 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 7400 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 7400 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 7400
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $570 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 248.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 96.1 vs 27.6 PassMark/$ ($229 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1920 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,010 vs 22,066).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 96.1 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7400 moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 1920 better than Ryzen 5 7400?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 7400 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 7400
The Ryzen 5 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,010 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen Threadripper 1920
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,066 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7400 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7400 versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — a 12.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7400 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7400 uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7400 scores 22,010 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1920's 22,066 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7400 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7400 | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+13% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+3% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 32 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-64% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 22,010 | 22,066 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7400 uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7400 | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | SP3r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 5 7400 was priced at $229, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 came in at $799. On launch pricing ($229 vs $799), Ryzen 5 7400 was $570 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 7400 delivers 96.1 pts/$ vs 27.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — making the Ryzen 5 7400 the 110.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7400 | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229-71% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 96.1+248% | 27.6 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














