
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Popular choices:

Xeon D-1726
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+60% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 10 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 70W, a 5W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,342 vs 15,511).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon D-1726 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon D-1726
2022Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
2018Xeon D-1726
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+60% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 10 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 70W, a 5W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,342 vs 15,511).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon D-1726 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 16 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 better than Xeon D-1726?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 | Xeon D-1726 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 | Xeon D-1726 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 336 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 265 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 94 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 | Xeon D-1726 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 388 FPS |
| medium | 384 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 384 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 384 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 388 FPS |
| medium | 384 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 384 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 388 FPS |
| medium | 319 FPS | 311 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 269 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 211 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 | Xeon D-1726 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 388 FPS |
| medium | 384 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 384 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 384 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 388 FPS |
| medium | 384 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 384 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 384 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 388 FPS |
| medium | 384 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 384 FPS | 365 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 321 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and Xeon D-1726


Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 15,342 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon D-1726
Xeon D-1726
The Xeon D-1726 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,511 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-1726 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1726 — a 15.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is built on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 scores 15,342 against the Xeon D-1726's 15,511 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon D-1726. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 vs 10 MB on the Xeon D-1726.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 | Xeon D-1726 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+17% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+10% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+60% | 10 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 12 nm | 10 nm-17% |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | — |
| PassMark | 15,342 | 15,511+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1726 uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 | Xeon D-1726 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA2227 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












