Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 vs Xeon W-10885M

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 vs Xeon W-10885M Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

8 / 16

15,342

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

Ryzen 9 8940HX

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon W-10885M

8 / 16

15,486

+0.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 vs Xeon W-10885M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 vs Xeon W-10885M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

2018

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-10885M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (15,342 vs 15,486).
❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon W-10885M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.

Xeon W-10885M

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-10885M better than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-10885M makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-10885M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-10885M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-10885M is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon W-10885M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (51.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-10885M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2018) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 vs Xeon W-10885M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 15,342 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-10885M

The Xeon W-10885M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,486 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and Xeon W-10885M share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-10885M — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-10885M (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon W-10885M uses Comet Lake-H (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 scores 15,342 against the Xeon W-10885M's 15,486 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon W-10885M. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 vs 16 MB on the Xeon W-10885M.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700	Xeon W-10885M
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz	5.1 GHz+24%
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+33%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	16 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB
Process	12 nm-14%	14 nm
Architecture	Zen+ (2018−2019)	Comet Lake-H (2020)
PassMark	15,342	15,486

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-10885M uses BGA1440 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.