Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 vs Xeon E5-4610 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4610 v4, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4610 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-4610 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (15,084 vs 15,342).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

2018

Xeon E5-4610 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4610 v4, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4610 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (15,084 vs 15,342).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 better than Xeon E5-4610 v4?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-4610 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 8.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is the better fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is at an unclear MSRP at $299 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 8.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (51.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-4610 v4 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700	Xeon E5-4610 v4
1080p
low	176 FPS	158 FPS
medium	154 FPS	137 FPS
high	128 FPS	111 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	91 FPS
1440p
low	145 FPS	133 FPS
medium	122 FPS	112 FPS
high	97 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	66 FPS	62 FPS
medium	59 FPS	56 FPS
high	47 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	34 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 Open Xeon E5-4610 v4

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700	Xeon E5-4610 v4
1080p
low	336 FPS	188 FPS
medium	297 FPS	170 FPS
high	265 FPS	148 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	122 FPS
1440p
low	307 FPS	162 FPS
medium	278 FPS	149 FPS
high	246 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	215 FPS	107 FPS
4K
low	225 FPS	106 FPS
medium	207 FPS	98 FPS
high	193 FPS	87 FPS
ultra	168 FPS	69 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 Open Xeon E5-4610 v4

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700	Xeon E5-4610 v4
1080p
low	384 FPS	377 FPS
medium	384 FPS	377 FPS
high	384 FPS	377 FPS
ultra	384 FPS	377 FPS
1440p
low	384 FPS	377 FPS
medium	384 FPS	377 FPS
high	384 FPS	377 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	377 FPS
4K
low	384 FPS	377 FPS
medium	319 FPS	372 FPS
high	281 FPS	338 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	279 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 Open Xeon E5-4610 v4

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700	Xeon E5-4610 v4
1080p
low	384 FPS	377 FPS
medium	384 FPS	377 FPS
high	384 FPS	377 FPS
ultra	384 FPS	377 FPS
1440p
low	384 FPS	377 FPS
medium	384 FPS	377 FPS
high	384 FPS	377 FPS
ultra	384 FPS	377 FPS
4K
low	384 FPS	377 FPS
medium	384 FPS	377 FPS
high	384 FPS	350 FPS
ultra	332 FPS	301 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 Open Xeon E5-4610 v4

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and Xeon E5-4610 v4

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 15,342 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-4610 v4

The Xeon E5-4610 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,084 points. Launch price was $1,219.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-4610 v4 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-4610 v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 versus 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-4610 v4 — a 78% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-4610 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 scores 15,342 against the Xeon E5-4610 v4's 15,084 — a 1.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-4610 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700	Xeon E5-4610 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+128%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+78%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	25 MB+56%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	2.5 MB+400%
Process	12 nm-14%	14 nm
Architecture	Zen+ (2018−2019)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	15,342+2%	15,084

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4610 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.