Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U vs Xeon E5-4640

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U vs Xeon E5-4640 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U

4 / 8

6,978

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5-4640

8 / 16

7,012

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U vs Xeon E5-4640 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U vs Xeon E5-4640: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4640 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,978 vs 7,012).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4640, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Xeon E5-4640

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $2,725 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-4640 better than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4640 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-4640 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4640 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-4640 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-4640 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $2,725 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (2.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U vs Xeon E5-4640 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,978 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-4640

The Xeon E5-4640 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,012 points. Launch price was $2,730.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4640 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-4640 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-4640 — a 30.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U uses the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-4640 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U scores 6,978 against the Xeon E5-4640's 7,012 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-4640. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-4640.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U	Xeon E5-4640
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+36%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.4 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	20480 kB (total)+400%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Raven Ridge (2017−2019)	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark	6,978	7,012

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4640 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.