Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs Xeon E5-2689 v4

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs Xeon E5-2689 v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

8 / 16

16,959

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2689 v4

10 / 20

17,084

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs Xeon E5-2689 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs Xeon E5-2689 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,394 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,723 MSRP).
✅Delivers 721.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.5 vs 6.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,723 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 165W, a 60W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (16,959 vs 17,084).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2689 v4, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.

Xeon E5-2689 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($2,723 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌57.1% higher power demand at 165W vs 105W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X better than Xeon E5-2689 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2689 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2689 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X comes in $2,394 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $2,723 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2689 v4 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.7% better PassMark. It is also 721.6% better value on MSRP (51.5 vs 6.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs Xeon E5-2689 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,959 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2689 v4

The Xeon E5-2689 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 17,084 points. Launch price was $2,723.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2689 v4 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2689 v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2689 v4 — a 7.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2689 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X scores 16,959 against the Xeon E5-2689 v4's 17,084 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E5-2689 v4. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2689 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X	Xeon E5-2689 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+8%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+16%	3.1 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	25 MB+56%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+20380%	2.5 MB
Process	12 nm-14%	14 nm
Architecture	Zen+ (2018−2019)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	16,959	17,084
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,255	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	6,243	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2689 v4 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X	Xeon E5-2689 v4
Socket	AM4	LGA2011-3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X) / not specified (Xeon E5-2689 v4). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X targets Workstation.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X	Xeon E5-2689 v4
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Workstation	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X was priced at $329, while the Xeon E5-2689 v4 came in at $2723. On launch pricing ($329 vs $2723), Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X was $2394 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X delivers 51.5 pts/$ vs 6.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2689 v4 — making the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X the 156.6% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X	Xeon E5-2689 v4
MSRP	$329-88%	$2723
Performance per Dollar	51.5+717%	6.3
Release Date	2018	2016

Search Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2689 v4 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.