Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs Xeon E-2378

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs Xeon E-2378 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

8 / 16

16,959

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E-2378

8 / 16

17,069

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs Xeon E-2378 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs Xeon E-2378: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $33 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $362 MSRP).
✅Delivers 9.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.5 vs 47.2 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $362 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Prism), unlike Xeon E-2378.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2378 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (6,243 vs 9,986).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.

Xeon E-2378

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 47.2 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($362 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2378 better than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E-2378 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E-2378 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2378 is the stronger fit. You are getting 60% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2378 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E-2378 comes in 10.0% more expensive on MSRP at $362 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is also 9.3% better value on MSRP (51.5 vs 47.2 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2378 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2018), more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs Xeon E-2378 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,959 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E-2378

The Xeon E-2378 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 17,069 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and Xeon E-2378 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon E-2378 — a 15.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2378 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E-2378 uses Rocket Lake-E (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X scores 16,959 against the Xeon E-2378's 17,069 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E-2378. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,255 vs 1,821, a 36.8% lead for the Xeon E-2378 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 6,243 vs 9,986 (46.1% advantage for the Xeon E-2378). Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X	Xeon E-2378
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz	4.8 GHz+17%
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+38%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	12 nm-14%	14 nm
Architecture	Zen+ (2018−2019)	Rocket Lake-E (2021)
PassMark	16,959	17,069
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,255	1,821+45%
Geekbench 6 Multi	6,243	9,986+60%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E-2378 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon E-2378 — the Xeon E-2378 supports 9.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: X470,B450,X370,B350,A320 (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X) and C252,C256 (Xeon E-2378).

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X	Xeon E-2378
Socket	AM4	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	DDR4-3200+9%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon E-2378 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X) vs Yes (Xeon E-2378). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X targets Workstation.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X	Xeon E-2378
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	Yes
Target Use	Workstation	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X was priced at $329, while the Xeon E-2378 came in at $362. On launch pricing ($329 vs $362), Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X was $33 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X delivers 51.5 pts/$ vs 47.2 pts/$ for the Xeon E-2378 — making the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X the 8.9% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X	Xeon E-2378
MSRP	$329-9%	$362
Performance per Dollar	51.5+9%	47.2
Release Date	2018	2021

Search Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X on Amazon

Search Xeon E-2378 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.