Core Ultra 5 228V vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

CPU

GPU

Core Ultra 5 228V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2024

Core Ultra family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

8 Cores16 Thrd105 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2018

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core Ultra 5 228V vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X Performance Spectrum

Core Ultra 5 228V

8 / 8

16,955

0.0%

16,959

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 5 228V vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 5 228V vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 5 228V

2024

Why buy it

✅+4.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Costs $34 less on MSRP ($295 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Delivers 11.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 57.5 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($295 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Draws 17W instead of 105W, a 88W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Prism), unlike Core Ultra 5 228V.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 9,932).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.5 vs 57.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $295 MSRP).
❌517.6% higher power demand at 105W vs 17W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 228V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 228V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 228V better than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is ahead with a 11.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 228V pulls ahead with 4.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 228V is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 5 228V is the better buy right now. Core Ultra 5 228V comes in $34 cheaper on MSRP at $295 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it still gives you 4.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The compromise is that Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 11.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 11.5% better value on MSRP (57.5 vs 51.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 228V makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2018), a healthier platform with FCBGA2833 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core Ultra 5 228V vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 228V

The Core Ultra 5 228V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,955 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,959 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 228V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 228V versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X — a 9.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 228V (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 228V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 228V scores 16,955 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X's 16,959 — a 0% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 9,932 vs 9,500 (4.4% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 228V). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,585 vs 1,255, a 69.3% lead for the Core Ultra 5 228V that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,053 vs 6,243 (46.8% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 228V). L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 228V vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 228V	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+10%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.6 GHz+71%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	2.5 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+20380%
Process	3 nm-75%	12 nm
Architecture	Lunar Lake (2024)	Zen+ (2018−2019)
PassMark	16,955	16,959
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,932+5%	9,500
Geekbench 6 Single	2,585+106%	1,255
Geekbench 6 Multi	10,053+61%	6,243

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 228V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5X-8533 on the Core Ultra 5 228V versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X — the Core Ultra 5 228V supports 190.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Core Ultra 5 228V) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X) — the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core Ultra 5 228V) and X470,B450,X370,B350,A320 (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X).

Feature	Core Ultra 5 228V	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
Socket	FCBGA2833	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5X-8533+191%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	128 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	8	20+150%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: Yes (Core Ultra 5 228V) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X). The Core Ultra 5 228V includes integrated graphics (Arc 130V), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X targets Workstation.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 228V	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Arc 130V	—
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	Yes	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core Ultra 5 228V was priced at $295, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($295 vs $329), Core Ultra 5 228V was $34 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 228V delivers 57.5 pts/$ vs 51.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X — making the Core Ultra 5 228V the 10.9% better value option.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 228V	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
MSRP	$295-10%	$329
Performance per Dollar	57.5+12%	51.5
Release Date	2024	2018

Search Core Ultra 5 228V on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.