Core Ultra 5 228V vs Xeon E5-2689 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 5 228V vs Xeon E5-2689 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 5 228V vs Xeon E5-2689 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 5 228V

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,428 less on MSRP ($295 MSRP vs $2,723 MSRP).
✅Delivers 816.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 57.5 vs 6.3 PassMark/$ ($295 MSRP vs $2,723 MSRP).
✅Draws 17W instead of 165W, a 148W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011-3 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (16,955 vs 17,084).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2689 v4, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.

Xeon E5-2689 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 57.5 PassMark/$ ($2,723 MSRP vs $295 MSRP).
❌870.6% higher power demand at 165W vs 17W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011-3 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 228V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 228V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 228V better than Xeon E5-2689 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2689 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core Ultra 5 228V is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2689 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 5 228V is the better buy right now. Core Ultra 5 228V comes in $2,428 cheaper on MSRP at $295 MSRP versus $2,723 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2689 v4 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. It is also 816.1% better value on MSRP (57.5 vs 6.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 228V makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2016) and a healthier platform with FCBGA2833 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011-3. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core Ultra 5 228V vs Xeon E5-2689 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 228V

The Core Ultra 5 228V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,955 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2689 v4

The Xeon E5-2689 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 17,084 points. Launch price was $2,723.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 228V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2689 v4 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2689 v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 228V versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2689 v4 — a 16.9% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 228V (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 228V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Xeon E5-2689 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 228V scores 16,955 against the Xeon E5-2689 v4's 17,084 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E5-2689 v4. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 228V vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2689 v4.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 228V	Xeon E5-2689 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+18%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.1 GHz+48%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	25 MB+213%
L2 Cache	2.5 MB (per core)	2.5 MB
Process	3 nm-79%	14 nm
Architecture	Lunar Lake (2024)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	16,955	17,084
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,932	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,585	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	10,053	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 228V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2689 v4 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 228V	Xeon E5-2689 v4
Socket	FCBGA2833	LGA2011-3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5X-8533	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core Ultra 5 228V) / not specified (Xeon E5-2689 v4). The Core Ultra 5 228V includes integrated graphics (Arc 130V), while the Xeon E5-2689 v4 requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 228V	Xeon E5-2689 v4
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Arc 130V	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	Yes	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core Ultra 5 228V was priced at $295, while the Xeon E5-2689 v4 came in at $2723. On launch pricing ($295 vs $2723), Core Ultra 5 228V was $2428 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 228V delivers 57.5 pts/$ vs 6.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2689 v4 — making the Core Ultra 5 228V the 160.6% better value option.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 228V	Xeon E5-2689 v4
MSRP	$295-89%	$2723
Performance per Dollar	57.5+813%	6.3
Release Date	2024	2016

Search Core Ultra 5 228V on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2689 v4 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.