Core Ultra 5 228V vs Xeon W-3223

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 5 228V vs Xeon W-3223 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 5 228V vs Xeon W-3223: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 5 228V

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 17W instead of 160W, a 143W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc 130V, while Xeon W-3223 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3223 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (16,955 vs 16,956).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 17 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3223, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
❌
0.3% HIGHER MSRP
$295 MSRPvs$294 MSRP

Xeon W-3223

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (17 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $295 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌841.2% higher power demand at 160W vs 17W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 228V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 228V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3223 better than Core Ultra 5 228V?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-3223 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core Ultra 5 228V is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-3223 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3223 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 106.3% larger total L3 cache (17 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-3223 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-3223 comes in $1 cheaper on MSRP at $294 MSRP versus $295 MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 0.3% better value on MSRP (57.7 vs 57.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 228V makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with FCBGA2833 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core Ultra 5 228V vs Xeon W-3223 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 228V

The Core Ultra 5 228V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,955 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-3223

The Xeon W-3223 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,956 points. Launch price was $749.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 228V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon W-3223's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 228V versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon W-3223 — a 6.9% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 228V (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 228V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Xeon W-3223 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 228V scores 16,955 against the Xeon W-3223's 16,956 — a 0% lead for the Xeon W-3223. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 228V vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon W-3223.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 228V	Xeon W-3223
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+7%	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.5 GHz+67%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	16.5 MB+106%
L2 Cache	2.5 MB (per core)	8 MB+220%
Process	3 nm-79%	14 nm
Architecture	Lunar Lake (2024)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	16,955	16,956
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,932	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,585	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	10,053	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 228V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3223 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 228V	Xeon W-3223
Socket	FCBGA2833	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5X-8533	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core Ultra 5 228V) / not specified (Xeon W-3223). The Core Ultra 5 228V includes integrated graphics (Arc 130V), while the Xeon W-3223 requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 228V	Xeon W-3223
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Arc 130V	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	Yes	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core Ultra 5 228V was priced at $295, while the Xeon W-3223 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($295 vs $294), Xeon W-3223 was $1 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 228V delivers 57.5 pts/$ vs 57.7 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3223 — making the Xeon W-3223 the 0.3% better value option.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 228V	Xeon W-3223
MSRP	$295	$294
Performance per Dollar	57.5	57.7
Release Date	2024	2019

Search Core Ultra 5 228V on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3223 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.