Core Ultra 5 228V
VS
Core i9-10980HK

Core Ultra 5 228V vs Core i9-10980HK

Intel

Core Ultra 5 228V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Core i9-10980HK

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 228V

#96
Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
107%
#97
Core Ultra 5 226V
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
107%
#101
Core i5-1350P
MSRP: $320|Avg: $250
102%
#102
Core i3-1220P
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
101%
#107
Core Ultra 5 228V
MSRP: $295|Avg: $295
100%
#111
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $180
99%
#119
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
MSRP: $400|Avg: $380
95%
#120
Core i7-11850HE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $75
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i9-10980HK

#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
128%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
127%
#202
Core i9-10980HK
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i9-10980HK delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core Ultra 5 228V in both compute-intensive tasks (0.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore Ultra 5 228VCore i9-10980HK
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($295)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Lunar Lake (2024) / 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Comet Lake-H (2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore Ultra 5 228VCore i9-10980HK
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($295)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 228V and Core i9-10980HK

Intel

Core Ultra 5 228V

The Core Ultra 5 228V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,955 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Core i9-10980HK

The Core i9-10980HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,037 points. Launch price was $583.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 228V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i9-10980HK's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 228V versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-10980HK — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Core i9-10980HK (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 228V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Core i9-10980HK uses Comet Lake-H (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 228V scores 16,955 against the Core i9-10980HK's 17,037 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i9-10980HK. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 228V vs 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-10980HK.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 228VCore i9-10980HK
Cores / Threads
8 / 8
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz
5.1 GHz+13%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
2.4 GHz+14%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
2.5 MB (per core)+900%
256 kB (per core)
Process
3 nm-79%
14 nm
Architecture
Lunar Lake (2024)
Comet Lake-H (2020)
PassMark
16,955
17,037
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,932
Geekbench 6 Single
2,585
Geekbench 6 Multi
10,053
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 228V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-10980HK uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 228VCore i9-10980HK
Socket
FCBGA2833
BGA1440
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5X-8533
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core Ultra 5 228V) / not specified (Core i9-10980HK). The Core Ultra 5 228V includes integrated graphics (Arc 130V), while the Core i9-10980HK requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 228VCore i9-10980HK
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Arc 130V
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes