Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs Xeon D-1848TER

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs Xeon D-1848TER Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

8 / 16

16,959

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon D-1848TER

10 / 20

16,952

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs Xeon D-1848TER FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs Xeon D-1848TER: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Prism), unlike Xeon D-1848TER.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1848TER, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon D-1848TER mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌84.2% higher power demand at 105W vs 57W.

Xeon D-1848TER

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
✅Draws 57W instead of 105W, a 48W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (16,952 vs 16,959).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X better than Xeon D-1848TER?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1848TER makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 20.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X comes in at an unclear MSRP at $329 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 20.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (51.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1848TER makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2018). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs Xeon D-1848TER Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,959 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon D-1848TER

The Xeon D-1848TER is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 57 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,952 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-1848TER offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon D-1848TER has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-1848TER — a 27.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is built on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X scores 16,959 against the Xeon D-1848TER's 16,952 — a 0% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs 15360 kB on the Xeon D-1848TER.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X	Xeon D-1848TER
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+32%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+80%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)+7%	15360 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	12 nm	—
Architecture	Zen+ (2018−2019)	—
PassMark	16,959	16,952
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,255	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	6,243	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1848TER uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X	Xeon D-1848TER
Socket	AM4	FCBGA2227
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—