
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G
Popular choices:

Xeon D-2766NT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 97W, a 32W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2766NT, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Xeon D-2766NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon D-2766NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,013 vs 24,216).
- ❌49.2% higher power demand at 97W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G
2024Xeon D-2766NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 97W, a 32W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2766NT, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Xeon D-2766NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,013 vs 24,216).
- ❌49.2% higher power demand at 97W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G better than Xeon D-2766NT?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G | Xeon D-2766NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G | Xeon D-2766NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 304 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 317 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 278 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 224 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 77 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G | Xeon D-2766NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 605 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 574 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 519 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 431 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 437 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 416 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 363 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 376 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 230 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G | Xeon D-2766NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 605 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 605 FPS | 600 FPS |
| high | 605 FPS | 600 FPS |
| ultra | 605 FPS | 548 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 605 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 605 FPS | 574 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 419 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 520 FPS | 449 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 309 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G and Xeon D-2766NT


Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 24,216 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon D-2766NT
Xeon D-2766NT
The Xeon D-2766NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 97 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 24,013 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-2766NT offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon D-2766NT has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2766NT — a 39% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is built on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G scores 24,216 against the Xeon D-2766NT's 24,013 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G vs 20 MB on the Xeon D-2766NT.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G | Xeon D-2766NT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 14 / 28+75% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+48% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+90% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 20 MB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Cezanne (2021−2025) | — |
| PassMark | 24,216 | 24,013 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-2766NT uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G | Xeon D-2766NT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA2579 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











