
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G

Xeon E5-2679 v4
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G vs Xeon E5-2679 v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G vs Xeon E5-2679 v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G vs Xeon E5-2679 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,402 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 803.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 80.7 vs 8.9 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 50 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2679 v4, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-2679 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,131 vs 24,216).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.9 vs 80.7 PassMark/$ ($2,702 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G better than Xeon E5-2679 v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G vs Xeon E5-2679 v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 24,216 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2679 v4
The Xeon E5-2679 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 50 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,131 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon E5-2679 v4 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2679 v4 — a 32.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G uses the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G scores 24,216 against the Xeon E5-2679 v4's 24,131 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G vs 50 MB on the Xeon E5-2679 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G | Xeon E5-2679 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 20 / 40+150% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+39% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+52% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 50 MB+213% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 5 MB+900% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cezanne (2021−2025) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 24,216 | 24,131 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 12,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G | Xeon E5-2679 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011-3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 1536 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G) / Yes (Xeon E5-2679 v4).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G | Xeon E5-2679 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G was priced at $300, while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 came in at $2702. On launch pricing ($300 vs $2702), Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G was $2402 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G delivers 80.7 pts/$ vs 8.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2679 v4 — making the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G the 160.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G | Xeon E5-2679 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-89% | $2702 |
| Performance per Dollar | 80.7+807% | 8.9 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2016 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













