
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U

Xeon E5-2699 v4
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U vs Xeon E5-2699 v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U vs Xeon E5-2699 v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U vs Xeon E5-2699 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 145W, a 137W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,531 vs 24,711).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 55 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699 v4, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-2699 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+243.8% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $4,115 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1712.5% higher power demand at 145W vs 8W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U moves to FP7/FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U better than Xeon E5-2699 v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U vs Xeon E5-2699 v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR5x, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,531 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2699 v4
The Xeon E5-2699 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB. L2 cache: 5.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,711 points. Launch price was $4,115.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2699 v4 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon E5-2699 v4 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2699 v4 — a 34.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U uses the Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2699 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U scores 24,531 against the Xeon E5-2699 v4's 24,711 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E5-2699 v4. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U vs 55 MB on the Xeon E5-2699 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U | Xeon E5-2699 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 22 / 44+175% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+42% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+50% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 55 MB+244% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+45% | 5.5 MB |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 24,531 | 24,711 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U uses the FP7/FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2699 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U | Xeon E5-2699 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7/FP8 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 1536 |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2699 v4). Direct competitor: Xeon E5-2699 v4 rivals Xeon Silver 4114.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U | Xeon E5-2699 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












