Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Xeon 6353P

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Xeon 6353P Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

8 / 16

26,864

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon 6353P

8 / 16

26,910

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Xeon 6353P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Xeon 6353P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (26,864 vs 26,910).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).

Xeon 6353P

2025

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6353P better than Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon 6353P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6353P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6353P still makes the most sense overall. Xeon 6353P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6353P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024), 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Xeon 6353P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,864 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon 6353P

The Xeon 6353P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 26,910 points. Launch price was $426.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS and Xeon 6353P share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon 6353P — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6353P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS scores 26,864 against the Xeon 6353P's 26,910 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon 6353P. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon 6353P.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS	Xeon 6353P
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz	5.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+22%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	24 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm-43%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Hawk Point (2024−2025)	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
PassMark	26,864	26,910

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6353P uses LGA1700 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.