M2 Max
VS
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

M2 Max vs Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

M2 Max

12 Cores12 Thrd36 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2023
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

8 Cores16 Thrd28 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar M2 Max

#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
126%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
126%
#201
M2 Max
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

#153
EPYC 7303P
MSRP: $594|Avg: $594
103%
#155
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
MSRP: $799|Avg: $999
102%
#166
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#169
Xeon E-2356G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $544
99%
#171
Xeon W-2140B
MSRP: $294|Avg: $99
99%
#176
Xeon 6325P
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#178
Xeon Silver 4510
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
97%
#179
Xeon W-3223
MSRP: $294|Avg: $294
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the M2 Max in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightM2 MaxRyzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Legacy / 5 nm)
✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightM2 MaxRyzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of M2 Max and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

M2 Max

The M2 Max is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.424 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MB + 48 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,824 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,864 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The M2 Max packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the M2 Max has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the M2 Max versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS — a 31.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS (base: 2.424 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is built on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the M2 Max scores 26,824 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS's 26,864 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. L3 cache: 48 MB on the M2 Max vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS.

FeatureM2 MaxRyzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Cores / Threads
12 / 12+50%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
5.1 GHz+38%
Base Clock
2.424 GHz
3.3 GHz+36%
L3 Cache
48 MB+200%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
36 MB+3500%
1 MB (per core)
Process
5 nm
4 nm-20%
Architecture
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
PassMark
26,824
26,864
🧠

Memory & Platform

The M2 Max uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureM2 MaxRyzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Socket
none
FP7
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
96 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Virtualization (M2 Max) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS). The M2 Max includes integrated graphics (Apple M2 Max GPU), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M2 Max targets Mobile.

FeatureM2 MaxRyzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Apple M2 Max GPU
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Virtualization
Target Use
Mobile