M2 Max vs Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

M2 Max vs Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

M2 Max vs Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

M2 Max

2023

Why buy it

✅+200% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M2 Max GPU, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (26,824 vs 26,864).
❌28.6% higher power demand at 36W vs 28W.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 36W, a 8W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 48 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while M2 Max can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS better than M2 Max?

Yes. Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 18.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 18.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 18.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 12/12. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

M2 Max vs Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

M2 Max

The M2 Max is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.424 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MB + 48 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,824 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,864 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The M2 Max packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the M2 Max has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the M2 Max versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS — a 31.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS (base: 2.424 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is built on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the M2 Max scores 26,824 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS's 26,864 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. L3 cache: 48 MB on the M2 Max vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS.

Feature	M2 Max	Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Cores / Threads	12 / 12+50%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	5.1 GHz+38%
Base Clock	2.424 GHz	3.3 GHz+36%
L3 Cache	48 MB+200%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	36 MB+3500%	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm	4 nm-20%
Architecture	—	Hawk Point (2024−2025)
PassMark	26,824	26,864

🧠

Memory & Platform

The M2 Max uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	M2 Max	Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Socket	none	FP7
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5-6400	—
Max RAM Capacity	96 GB	—
RAM Channels	4	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Virtualization (M2 Max) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS). The M2 Max includes integrated graphics (Apple M2 Max GPU), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M2 Max targets Mobile.