M2 Max
VS
Xeon Gold 6252

M2 Max vs Xeon Gold 6252

M2 Max

12 Cores12 Thrd36 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6252

24 Cores48 Thrd150 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar M2 Max

#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
126%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
126%
#201
M2 Max
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Gold 6252

#41
Xeon W-2195
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
103%
#42
Xeon Gold 6252
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#50
Xeon Gold 6238R
MSRP: $2612|Avg: N/A
81%
#54
EPYC 4465P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
70%
#55
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
MSRP: $229|Avg: $192
67%
#56
Xeon E5-4667 v3
MSRP: $128|Avg: $128
66%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon Gold 6252 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightM2 MaxXeon Gold 6252
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Legacy / 5 nm)
✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The M2 Max ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightM2 MaxXeon Gold 6252
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of M2 Max and Xeon Gold 6252

M2 Max

The M2 Max is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.424 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MB + 48 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,824 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6252

The Xeon Gold 6252 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,148 points. Launch price was $3,655.

Processing Power

The M2 Max packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6252 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6252 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the M2 Max versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6252 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.424 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6252 is built on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the M2 Max scores 26,824 against the Xeon Gold 6252's 27,148 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon Gold 6252. L3 cache: 48 MB on the M2 Max vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6252.

FeatureM2 MaxXeon Gold 6252
Cores / Threads
12 / 12
24 / 48+100%
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
2.424 GHz+15%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
48 MB+34%
35.75 MB
L2 Cache
36 MB+50%
24 MB
Process
5 nm-64%
14 nm
Architecture
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark
26,824
27,148+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The M2 Max uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6252 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureM2 MaxXeon Gold 6252
Socket
none
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
96 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Virtualization (M2 Max) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6252). The M2 Max includes integrated graphics (Apple M2 Max GPU), while the Xeon Gold 6252 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M2 Max targets Mobile.

FeatureM2 MaxXeon Gold 6252
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Apple M2 Max GPU
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Virtualization
Target Use
Mobile