M2 Max
VS
Core i9-12900H

M2 Max vs Core i9-12900H

M2 Max

12 Cores12 Thrd36 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Core i9-12900H

14 Cores20 Thrd45 WWMax: 5 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar M2 Max

#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
126%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
126%
#201
M2 Max
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i9-12900H

#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
104%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
101%
#160
Core i9-12900H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
100%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
99%
#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
96%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
95%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i9-12900H delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the M2 Max in both compute-intensive tasks (0.9% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightM2 MaxCore i9-12900H
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Legacy / 5 nm)
✨ Modern (Alder Lake-H (2022) / Intel 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightM2 MaxCore i9-12900H
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of M2 Max and Core i9-12900H

M2 Max

The M2 Max is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.424 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MB + 48 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,824 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Core i9-12900H

The Core i9-12900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,079 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The M2 Max packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i9-12900H offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i9-12900H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the M2 Max versus 5 GHz on the Core i9-12900H — a 29.9% clock advantage for the Core i9-12900H (base: 2.424 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i9-12900H is built on the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the M2 Max scores 26,824 against the Core i9-12900H's 27,079 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i9-12900H. L3 cache: 48 MB on the M2 Max vs 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900H.

FeatureM2 MaxCore i9-12900H
Cores / Threads
12 / 12
14 / 20+17%
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
5 GHz+35%
Base Clock
2.424 GHz
2.5 GHz+3%
L3 Cache
48 MB+100%
24 MB (total)
L2 Cache
36 MB+2780%
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
5 nm-29%
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Alder Lake-H (2022)
PassMark
26,824
27,079
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,500
Geekbench 6 Single
2,400
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,900
🧠

Memory & Platform

The M2 Max uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i9-12900H uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR5-6400 memory speed. The M2 Max supports up to 96 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (M2 Max) vs 2 (Core i9-12900H). PCIe lanes: 0 (M2 Max) vs 20 (Core i9-12900H) — the Core i9-12900H offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureM2 MaxCore i9-12900H
Socket
none
FCBGA1744
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5-6400
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
96 GB+50%
64 GB
RAM Channels
4+100%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i9-12900H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: Virtualization (M2 Max) vs Yes (Core i9-12900H). Both include integrated graphics Apple M2 Max GPU (M2 Max) and Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Core i9-12900H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M2 Max targets Mobile, Core i9-12900H targets Mobile.

FeatureM2 MaxCore i9-12900H
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Apple M2 Max GPU
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
Virtualization
Yes
Target Use
Mobile
Mobile