M2 Max
VS
Core i9-13900HK

M2 Max vs Core i9-13900HK

M2 Max

12 Cores12 Thrd36 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Core i9-13900HK

14 Cores20 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar M2 Max

#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
126%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
126%
#201
M2 Max
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i9-13900HK

#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
112%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
111%
#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
108%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
106%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
103%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
100%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
99%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
98%
#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
95%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
93%
#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
87%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i9-13900HK delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the M2 Max in both compute-intensive tasks (1.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightM2 MaxCore i9-13900HK
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($697)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Legacy / 5 nm)
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightM2 MaxCore i9-13900HK
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($697)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of M2 Max and Core i9-13900HK

M2 Max

The M2 Max is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.424 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MB + 48 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,824 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Core i9-13900HK

The Core i9-13900HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 27,217 points. Launch price was $697.

Processing Power

The M2 Max packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i9-13900HK offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i9-13900HK has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the M2 Max versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900HK — a 37.4% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900HK (base: 2.424 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i9-13900HK is built on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the M2 Max scores 26,824 against the Core i9-13900HK's 27,217 — a 1.5% lead for the Core i9-13900HK. L3 cache: 48 MB on the M2 Max vs 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900HK.

FeatureM2 MaxCore i9-13900HK
Cores / Threads
12 / 12
14 / 20+17%
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
5.4 GHz+46%
Base Clock
2.424 GHz
2.6 GHz+7%
L3 Cache
48 MB+100%
24 MB (total)
L2 Cache
36 MB+1700%
2 MB (per core)
Process
5 nm-29%
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
PassMark
26,824
27,217+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,629
🧠

Memory & Platform

The M2 Max uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i9-13900HK uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR5-6400 memory speed. Both support up to 96 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 4 (M2 Max) vs 2 (Core i9-13900HK). PCIe lanes: 0 (M2 Max) vs 28 (Core i9-13900HK) — the Core i9-13900HK offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureM2 MaxCore i9-13900HK
Socket
none
FCBGA1744
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5-6400
DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity
96 GB
96 GB
RAM Channels
4+100%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
28
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i9-13900HK has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i9-13900HK supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Virtualization (M2 Max) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900HK). Both include integrated graphics Apple M2 Max GPU (M2 Max) and Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Core i9-13900HK) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M2 Max targets Mobile.

FeatureM2 MaxCore i9-13900HK
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Apple M2 Max GPU
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile