M2 Max
VS
EPYC 7451

M2 Max vs EPYC 7451

M2 Max

12 Cores12 Thrd36 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2023
VS
AMD

EPYC 7451

24 Cores48 Thrd180 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar M2 Max

#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
126%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
126%
#201
M2 Max
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7451

#3
Xeon W-11955M
MSRP: $623|Avg: $450
13%
#4
Xeon W-11865MLE
MSRP: $467|Avg: $350
13%
#5
Xeon W-11865MRE
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
12%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
147%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
131%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
101%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
101%
#18
EPYC 7451
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#21
Xeon Platinum 8260M
MSRP: $7705|Avg: N/A
92%
#22
Xeon Platinum 8268
MSRP: $6302|Avg: N/A
91%
#24
Xeon Gold 6130H
MSRP: $1894|Avg: N/A
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The M2 Max (2023) utilizes 5 nm technology and LPDDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightM2 MaxEPYC 7451
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Legacy / 5 nm)
✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The EPYC 7451 (2017) relies on 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Eight-channel**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightM2 MaxEPYC 7451
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of M2 Max and EPYC 7451

M2 Max

The M2 Max is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.424 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MB + 48 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,824 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

EPYC 7451

The EPYC 7451 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 26,639 points. Launch price was $2,400.

Processing Power

The M2 Max packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the EPYC 7451 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7451 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the M2 Max versus 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7451 — a 14.5% clock advantage for the M2 Max (base: 2.424 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The EPYC 7451 is built on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. In PassMark, the M2 Max scores 26,824 against the EPYC 7451's 26,639 — a 0.7% lead for the M2 Max. L3 cache: 48 MB on the M2 Max vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7451.

FeatureM2 MaxEPYC 7451
Cores / Threads
12 / 12
24 / 48+100%
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz+16%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.424 GHz+5%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
48 MB
64 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
36 MB+7100%
512K (per core)
Process
5 nm-64%
14 nm
Architecture
Naples (2017−2018)
PassMark
26,824
26,639
🧠

Memory & Platform

The M2 Max uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7451 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureM2 MaxEPYC 7451
Socket
none
TR4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
96 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Virtualization (M2 Max) / not specified (EPYC 7451). The M2 Max includes integrated graphics (Apple M2 Max GPU), while the EPYC 7451 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M2 Max targets Mobile.

FeatureM2 MaxEPYC 7451
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Apple M2 Max GPU
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Virtualization
Target Use
Mobile