M2 Max vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

M2 Max vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

M2 Max vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

M2 Max

2023

Why buy it

✅+200% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of FP7/FP8 and older memory support.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M2 Max GPU, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (26,824 vs 26,852).
❌350% higher power demand at 36W vs 8W.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +21.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 8W instead of 36W, a 28W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 48 MB).
❌Older platform position on FP7/FP8, while M2 Max moves to none and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while M2 Max can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS better than M2 Max?

Yes. Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 21.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 21.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 21.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

M2 Max makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a healthier platform with none and DDR5 instead of FP7/FP8 and 200% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 16 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

M2 Max vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

M2 Max

The M2 Max is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.424 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MB + 48 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,824 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 26,852 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The M2 Max packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the M2 Max has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the M2 Max versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS — a 31.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS (base: 2.424 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is built on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. In PassMark, the M2 Max scores 26,824 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS's 26,852 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS. L3 cache: 48 MB on the M2 Max vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS.

Feature	M2 Max	Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Cores / Threads	12 / 12+50%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	5.1 GHz+38%
Base Clock	2.424 GHz	3.8 GHz+57%
L3 Cache	48 MB+200%	16 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+350%	8 MB
Process	5 nm	4 nm-20%
Architecture	—	Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark	26,824	26,852

🧠

Memory & Platform

The M2 Max uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	M2 Max	Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Socket	none	FP7/FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5-6400	—
Max RAM Capacity	96 GB	—
RAM Channels	4	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Virtualization (M2 Max) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS). The M2 Max includes integrated graphics (Apple M2 Max GPU), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M2 Max targets Mobile.